BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17933742)

  • 1. The effect of self-affirmation in nonthreatening persuasion domains: timing affects the process.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Gallardo I; DeMarree KG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1533-46. PubMed ID: 17933742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Valle C; Rucker DD; Becerra A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 93(6):1040-53. PubMed ID: 18072853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-affirmation enhances attentional bias toward threatening components of a persuasive message.
    Klein WM; Harris PR
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1463-7. PubMed ID: 19883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Barden J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Nov; 93(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17983296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: the effects of source credibility in multiple message situations.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 17363764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How self-affirmation reduces defensive processing of threatening health information: evidence at the implicit level.
    van Koningsbruggen GM; Das E; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    Health Psychol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 19751082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does other-affirmation increase self-directed exposure to and persuasiveness of a threatening anti-alcohol message?
    Brown SL; Chen X; Coakley RG; Hlabangana N; Oakley E; Trenholme S
    Br J Health Psychol; 2019 Sep; 24(3):497-514. PubMed ID: 30920094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Fabrigar LR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18340037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Schema-derived persuasion and perception of AIDS risk.
    Brannon LA; McCabe AE
    Health Mark Q; 2002; 20(2):31-48. PubMed ID: 14609019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidental experiences of affective coherence and incoherence influence persuasion.
    Huntsinger JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):792-802. PubMed ID: 23542415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequencing the threat and recommendation components of persuasive messages differentially improves the effectiveness of high- and low-distressing imagery in an anti-alcohol message in students.
    Brown SL; West C
    Br J Health Psychol; 2015 May; 20(2):324-40. PubMed ID: 24754526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-generated persuasion: effects of the target and direction of arguments.
    Briñol P; McCaslin MJ; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):925-40. PubMed ID: 22352326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information.
    Harris PR; Napper L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1250-63. PubMed ID: 16055644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dark side of self-affirmation: confirmation bias and illusory correlation in response to threatening information.
    Munro GD; Stansbury JA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1143-53. PubMed ID: 19491331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The eye movement desensitization and reprocessing procedure prevents defensive processing in health persuasion.
    Dijkstra A; van Asten R
    Health Commun; 2014; 29(6):542-51. PubMed ID: 24138408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open-mindedness can decrease persuasion amongst adolescents: the role of self-affirmation.
    Good A; Harris PR; Jessop D; Abraham C
    Br J Health Psychol; 2015 May; 20(2):228-42. PubMed ID: 24471418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of self-control in resistance to persuasion.
    Burkley E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Mar; 34(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 18272808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.