These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17933982)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for the detection of coronary stenosis: do we really have to focus on "stenoses"? Burgstahler C; Schroeder S Heart; 2007 Nov; 93(11):1322-4. PubMed ID: 17933982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography. Maintz D; Ozgun M; Hoffmeier A; Quante M; Fischbach R; Manning WJ; Heindel W; Botnar RM Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 17957510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenosis. Silva C; Cheng S; Lima JA Minerva Cardioangiol; 2006 Feb; 54(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 16467741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis by vessel attenuation measurement on CT compared with adenosine perfusion MRI. den Dekker MAM; Pelgrim GJ; Pundziute G; van den Heuvel ER; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 25467226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Non-invasive coronary angiography by multidetector spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging]. Tron C; Dacher JN; Eltchaninoff H; Gerbaud E; Bertrand D; Cribier A Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2004 Sep; 53(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 15532448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT coronary angiography: where does it fit? Di Carli MF J Nucl Med; 2006 Sep; 47(9):1397-9. PubMed ID: 16954543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [CT coronary angiography combined with adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for detecting flow-limiting coronary stenoses]. Wang Q; Qin J; Wang ZG; Guan ZW; Dong W; Sun ZJ; Gai LY; Chen YD; Tian JH; Yang L Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Feb; 31(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 21354895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extremely high Agatston calcium score without significant coronary artery stenoses. Moriel M; Bogot NR; Wolak A; Hadas I; Weisz G Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 16(3):346. PubMed ID: 25525061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Dewey M; Teige F; Schnapauff D; Laule M; Borges AC; Wernecke KD; Schink T; Baumann G; Rutsch W; Rogalla P; Taupitz M; Hamm B Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):407-15. PubMed ID: 16983128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standard versus user-interactive assessment of significant coronary stenoses with multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Cademartiri F; Mollet N; Lemos PA; McFadden EP; Marano R; Baks T; Stijnen T; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(12):1590-3. PubMed ID: 15589028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Comparison with conventional x-ray angiography. Gaudio C; Tanzilli G; Vittore A; Arca M; Barillà F; Di Michele S; Minardi G; Fedele F; Lombardi M; Donato L Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2004; 8(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 15368796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who is a candidate for noninvasive coronary angiography? Greenland P Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):466-7. PubMed ID: 16983136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of coronary imaging between magnetic resonance imaging and electron beam computed tomography. van Geuns RJ; Oudkerk M; Rensing BJ; Bongaerts AH; de Bruin HG; Wielopolski PA; van Ooijen P; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW Am J Cardiol; 2002 Jul; 90(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12088783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? Gaemperli O; Husmann L; Schepis T; Koepfli P; Valenta I; Jenni W; Alkadhi H; Lüscher TF; Kaufmann PA Eur Heart J; 2009 Dec; 30(23):2921-9. PubMed ID: 19684023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined cardiac CT and MRI for the comprehensive workup of hemodynamically relevant coronary stenoses. Donati OF; Scheffel H; Stolzmann P; Baumüller S; Plass A; Leschka S; Alkadhi H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):920-6. PubMed ID: 20308492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve with phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with heavy coronary calcification. Higashikawa T; Ichikawa Y; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Hirano T; Sakuma H Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 May; 35(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 30805755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiographic assessment of coronary stenoses: a review of the techniques. Schrijver M Arch Physiol Biochem; 2003 Apr; 111(2):77-158. PubMed ID: 12919002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Greif M; von Ziegler F; Bamberg F; Tittus J; Schwarz F; D'Anastasi M; Marcus RP; Schenzle J; Becker C; Nikolaou K; Becker A Heart; 2013 Jul; 99(14):1004-11. PubMed ID: 23674364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography. Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Kefer J; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Sep; 1(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19808528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]