These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17935005)

  • 1. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
    Frankish C; Barnes L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of lexical representations: evidence from the position of the diverging letter effect.
    Peressotti F; Mulatti C; Job R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010; 106(2-3):177-83. PubMed ID: 20211474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: on the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations.
    Maloney E; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Besner D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):858-67. PubMed ID: 19107643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect.
    Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1930-47. PubMed ID: 19358058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes.
    Van Assche E; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):399-415. PubMed ID: 16569155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.
    Andrews S; Lo S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 21875252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quiet clam is quite calm: transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading.
    Johnson RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):943-69. PubMed ID: 19586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision.
    Braun M; Jacobs AM; Hahne A; Ricker B; Hofmann M; Hutzler F
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():431-9. PubMed ID: 16464440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations.
    Kinoshita S; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19210078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter position coding in attentional dyslexia.
    Shalev L; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2145-51. PubMed ID: 18420233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the masked priming same-different task a pure measure of prelexical processing?
    Kelly AN; van Heuven WJ; Pitchford NJ; Ledgeway T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e72888. PubMed ID: 24058447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words?
    McCormick SF; Brysbaert M; Rastle K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19418380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploiting degrees of inflectional ambiguity: stem form and the time course of morphological processing.
    Järvikivi J; Pyykkönen P; Niemi J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 19210092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: JUGDE facilitates COURT.
    Perea M; Palti D; Gomez P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 22274995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.
    Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):668-87. PubMed ID: 16822131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
    Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.
    Perea M; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):829-41. PubMed ID: 14651292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.