479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17935005)
1. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
Frankish C; Barnes L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of lexical representations: evidence from the position of the diverging letter effect.
Peressotti F; Mulatti C; Job R
J Exp Child Psychol; 2010; 106(2-3):177-83. PubMed ID: 20211474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: on the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations.
Maloney E; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Besner D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):858-67. PubMed ID: 19107643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect.
Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1930-47. PubMed ID: 19358058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes.
Van Assche E; Grainger J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):399-415. PubMed ID: 16569155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.
Andrews S; Lo S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 21875252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quiet clam is quite calm: transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading.
Johnson RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):943-69. PubMed ID: 19586263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision.
Braun M; Jacobs AM; Hahne A; Ricker B; Hofmann M; Hutzler F
Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():431-9. PubMed ID: 16464440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations.
Kinoshita S; Norris D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19210078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Letter position coding in attentional dyslexia.
Shalev L; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2145-51. PubMed ID: 18420233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the masked priming same-different task a pure measure of prelexical processing?
Kelly AN; van Heuven WJ; Pitchford NJ; Ledgeway T
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e72888. PubMed ID: 24058447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words?
McCormick SF; Brysbaert M; Rastle K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19418380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploiting degrees of inflectional ambiguity: stem form and the time course of morphological processing.
Järvikivi J; Pyykkönen P; Niemi J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 19210092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: JUGDE facilitates COURT.
Perea M; Palti D; Gomez P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 22274995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
Acha J; Perea M
Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.
Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):668-87. PubMed ID: 16822131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.
Perea M; Lupker SJ
Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):829-41. PubMed ID: 14651292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
