These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17935662)

  • 1. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model.
    Molenaar D; Dolan CV; Verhelst ND
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):293-317. PubMed ID: 19796474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
    Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power equivalence in structural equation modelling.
    von Oertzen T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):257-72. PubMed ID: 19527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
    Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models.
    Adams RJ; Wu ML
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 19934525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new class of parametric IRT models for dichotomous item scores.
    Hessen DJ
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(4):385-97. PubMed ID: 15496746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fitting polytomous Rasch models in SAS.
    Christensen KB
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 17068380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustified maximum likelihood estimation in generalized partial linear mixed model for longitudinal data.
    Qin GY; Zhu ZY
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 18479481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
    Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence curves for factor loadings.
    Kwan CW; Fung WK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):345-58. PubMed ID: 16293205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing nonlinear regression parameters under heteroscedastic, normally distributed errors.
    Kimura DK
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 2242410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On tests of rate ratio under standard inverse sampling.
    Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Mar; 89(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 18164512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.
    Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Composite likelihood and two-stage estimation in family studies.
    Andersen EW
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 14744825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hypothesis testing in an errors-in-variables model with heteroscedastic measurement errors.
    de Castro M; Galea M; Bolfarine H
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5217-34. PubMed ID: 18561290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.