These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17935662)

  • 21. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
    Gray G
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-linear structural equation models with correlated continuous and discrete data.
    Lee SY; Song XY; Cai JH; So WY; Ma CW; Chan CN
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):327-47. PubMed ID: 18590605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The structure of self-reported emotional experiences: a mixed-effects Poisson factor model.
    Böckenholt U; Kamakura WA; Wedel M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):215-29. PubMed ID: 14633333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
    Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Higher order inference for the consensus mean in inter-laboratory studies.
    Sharma G; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 21259313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamical system approach to factor analysis parameter estimation.
    Trendafilov NT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):27-46. PubMed ID: 12803820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proportion of third-level variation in multi-level studies: A note on an interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):417-26. PubMed ID: 19793411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Testing for the presence of cured patients: a simulation study.
    Peng Y; Dear KB; Carriere KC
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1783-96. PubMed ID: 11406841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
    Reiser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of tests of the difference in the proportion of patients who are cured.
    Sposto R; Sather HN; Baker SA
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 1581495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity to initial values in full non-parametric maximum-likelihood estimation of the two-parameter logistic model.
    Nader IW; Tran US; Formann AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):320-36. PubMed ID: 21492136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Where is the likelihood ratio test powerful for detecting two component normal mixtures?
    Mendell NR; Finch SJ; Thode HC
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 8241377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loglinear representations of multivariate Bernoulli Rasch models.
    Hessen DJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):337-54. PubMed ID: 21492137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
    Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.