These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17936234)

  • 1. Decisions among time saving options: when intuition is strong and wrong.
    Svenson O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 17936234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
    Inbar Y; Cone J; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):232-47. PubMed ID: 20658841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speeding and the time-saving bias: how drivers' estimations of time saved in higher speed affects their choice of speed.
    Peer E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1978-82. PubMed ID: 20728651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceived diversity heuristic: the case of pseudodiversity.
    Ayal S; Zakay D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):559-73. PubMed ID: 19254103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.
    Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment: lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis.
    Masicampo EJ; Baumeister RF
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Mar; 19(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 18315798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
    Koehler DJ; James G
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 19664762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?
    Hicks EP; Kluemper GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 21392683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Empirical Case for Acquiescing to Intuition.
    Walco DK; Risen JL
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1807-1820. PubMed ID: 29040055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
    Kahneman D
    Am Psychol; 2003 Sep; 58(9):697-720. PubMed ID: 14584987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
    Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
    Bartels DM
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When two motivations race: The effects of time-saving bias and sensation-seeking on driving speed choices.
    Peer E; Rosenbloom T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1135-9. PubMed ID: 23021421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.