These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1793687)

  • 21. MEG and EEG topography of frontal midline theta rhythm and source localization.
    Iramina K; Ueno S; Matsuoka S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 8728427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4903-6. PubMed ID: 23367027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.
    Inverso SA; Goh XL; Henriksson L; Vanni S; James AC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 May; 37(5):1696-709. PubMed ID: 26870938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simultaneous EEG/MEG yields complementary information of nociceptive evoked responses.
    Ahmed Mahmutoglu M; Rupp A; Baumgärtner U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Nov; 143():21-35. PubMed ID: 36087398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
    Hauk O; Rice GE; Volfart A; Magnabosco F; Ralph MAL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118460. PubMed ID: 34363957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
    Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Combined EEG and MEG analysis of early somatosensory evoked activity in children and adolescents with focal epilepsies.
    Bast T; Wright T; Boor R; Harting I; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Hoechstetter K; Rating D; Baumgärtner U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1721-35. PubMed ID: 17572142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Consistent and precise localization of brain activity in human primary visual cortex by MEG and fMRI.
    Moradi F; Liu LC; Cheng K; Waggoner RA; Tanaka K; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2003 Mar; 18(3):595-609. PubMed ID: 12667837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of EEG and MEG in source localization of induced human gamma-band oscillations during visual stimulus.
    Mideksa KG; Hoogenboom N; Hellriegel H; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():8119-22. PubMed ID: 26738178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.