192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1793693)
1. EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN
Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 1793693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for combining MEG and EEG to determine the sources.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN
Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jan; 32(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 3823144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MEG-EEG Information Fusion and Electromagnetic Source Imaging: From Theory to Clinical Application in Epilepsy.
Chowdhury RA; Zerouali Y; Hedrich T; Heers M; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
Brain Topogr; 2015 Nov; 28(6):785-812. PubMed ID: 26016950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Source localization determined by magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography in temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison with electrocorticography: technical case report.
Ko DY; Kufta C; Scaffidi D; Sato S
Neurosurgery; 1998 Feb; 42(2):414-21; discussion 421-2. PubMed ID: 9482198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con.
Baumgartner C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 115(5):1010-20. PubMed ID: 15066524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization.
Yoshinaga H; Nakahori T; Ohtsuka Y; Oka E; Kitamura Y; Kiriyama H; Kinugasa K; Miyamoto K; Hoshida T
Epilepsia; 2002 Aug; 43(8):924-8. PubMed ID: 12181013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ictal magnetoencephalography in temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy.
Assaf BA; Karkar KM; Laxer KD; Garcia PA; Austin EJ; Barbaro NM; Aminoff MJ
Epilepsia; 2003 Oct; 44(10):1320-7. PubMed ID: 14510826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
