These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1793693)

  • 21. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EEG and MEG source analysis of single and averaged interictal spikes reveals intrinsic epileptogenicity in focal cortical dysplasia.
    Bast T; Oezkan O; Rona S; Stippich C; Seitz A; Rupp A; Fauser S; Zentner J; Rating D; Scherg M
    Epilepsia; 2004 Jun; 45(6):621-31. PubMed ID: 15144427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling and source localization of MEG activities.
    Ueno S; Iramina K
    Brain Topogr; 1990; 3(1):151-65. PubMed ID: 2094303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
    Stenroos M; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 6190632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection.
    Ramantani G; Boor R; Paetau R; Ille N; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Boppel T; Scherg M; Rating D; Bast T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 17143138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of an MEG device as 3D digitizer and motion monitoring system.
    de Munck JC; Verbunt JP; Van't Ent D; Van Dijk BW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2041-52. PubMed ID: 11512609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined EEG and MEG analysis of early somatosensory evoked activity in children and adolescents with focal epilepsies.
    Bast T; Wright T; Boor R; Harting I; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Hoechstetter K; Rating D; Baumgärtner U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1721-35. PubMed ID: 17572142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetoencephalographic Identification of Epileptic Focus in Children With Generalized Electroencephalographic (EEG) Features but Focal Imaging Abnormalities.
    Shukla G; Kazutaka J; Gupta A; Mosher J; Jones S; Alexopoulos A; Burgess RC
    J Child Neurol; 2017 Oct; 32(12):981-995. PubMed ID: 28828916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.