These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17937996)

  • 1. Multigene analysis of lophophorate and chaetognath phylogenetic relationships.
    Helmkampf M; Bruchhaus I; Hausdorf B
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):206-14. PubMed ID: 17937996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenetic relationships within the lophophorate lineages (Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda and Phoronida).
    Hausdorf B; Helmkampf M; Nesnidal MP; Bruchhaus I
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Jun; 55(3):1121-7. PubMed ID: 20045074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept.
    Helmkampf M; Bruchhaus I; Hausdorf B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Aug; 275(1645):1927-33. PubMed ID: 18495619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The complete mitochondrial genome of Watersipora subtorquata (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Ctenostomata) with phylogenetic consideration of Bryozoa.
    Sun M; Wu Z; Shen X; Ren J; Liu X; Liu H; Liu B
    Gene; 2009 Jun; 439(1-2):17-24. PubMed ID: 19289161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular paleobiological insights into the origin of the Brachiopoda.
    Sperling EA; Pisani D; Peterson KJ
    Evol Dev; 2011; 13(3):290-303. PubMed ID: 21535467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lophotrochozoan phylogeny assessed with LSU and SSU data: evidence of lophophorate polyphyly.
    Passamaneck Y; Halanych KM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2006 Jul; 40(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 16556507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete mitochondrial genome of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Cheilostomata): phylogenetic position of Bryozoa and phylogeny of lophophorates within the Lophotrochozoa.
    Jang KH; Hwang UW
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():167. PubMed ID: 19379522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia.
    Philippe H; Lartillot N; Brinkmann H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15703236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence from Hox genes that bryozoans are lophotrochozoans.
    Passamaneck YJ; Halanych KM
    Evol Dev; 2004; 6(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15230967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria.
    Lartillot N; Philippe H
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Apr; 363(1496):1463-72. PubMed ID: 18192187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mitochondrial genome of Phoronis architecta--comparisons demonstrate that phoronids are lophotrochozoan protostomes.
    Helfenbein KG; Boore JL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jan; 21(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 14595093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and an Ectoproct-Phoronid clade and indicate that Polyzoa and Kryptrochozoa are caused by systematic bias.
    Nesnidal MP; Helmkampf M; Meyer A; Witek A; Bruchhaus I; Ebersberger I; Hankeln T; Lieb B; Struck TH; Hausdorf B
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Nov; 13():253. PubMed ID: 24238092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes, unrelated to Ectoprocta.
    Mackey LY; Winnepenninckx B; De Wachter R; Backeljau T; Emschermann P; Garey JR
    J Mol Evol; 1996 May; 42(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 8662007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilaterian phylogeny: a broad sampling of 13 nuclear genes provides a new Lophotrochozoa phylogeny and supports a paraphyletic basal acoelomorpha.
    Paps J; Baguñà J; Riutort M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Oct; 26(10):2397-406. PubMed ID: 19602542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genus Tetrastemma Ehrenberg, 1831 (Phylum Nemertea)--a natural group? Phylogenetic relationships inferred from partial 18S rRNA sequences.
    Strand M; Sundberg P
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Oct; 37(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 16182152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interrelationships of metazoan parasites: a review of phylum-and higher-level hypotheses from recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses.
    Zrzavý J
    Folia Parasitol (Praha); 2001; 48(2):81-103. PubMed ID: 11437135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lophotrochozoan relationships and parasites. A snap-shot.
    Bleidorn C
    Parasite; 2008 Sep; 15(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 18814703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monophyly of brachiopods and phoronids: reconciliation of molecular evidence with Linnaean classification (the subphylum Phoroniformea nov.).
    Cohen BL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Feb; 267(1440):225-31. PubMed ID: 10714876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phoronida-A small clade with a big role in understanding the evolution of lophophorates.
    Gąsiorowski L
    Evol Dev; 2024 Jul; 26(4):e12437. PubMed ID: 37119003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Molecular phylogeny of gastrotricha based on 18S rRNA genes comparison: rejection of hypothesis of relatedness with nematodes].
    Petrov NB; Pegova AN; Manylov OG; Vladychenskaia NS; Miuge NS; Aleshin VV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2007; 41(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 17685227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.