These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 179387)

  • 1. Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.
    Kundel HL; Revesz G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Jun; 126(6):1233-8. PubMed ID: 179387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conspicuity and uncertainty in the radiographic detection of lesions.
    Revesz G
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):625-8. PubMed ID: 3969462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.
    Lams PM; Cocklin ML
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 3940365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral vision, structured noise and film reader error.
    Kundel HL
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 1110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missed lung cancer: when, where, and why?
    Del Ciello A; Franchi P; Contegiacomo A; Cicchetti G; Bonomo L; Larici AR
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2017; 23(2):118-126. PubMed ID: 28206951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Isodensitometric analysis of the radiographies].
    Braun JP; Blanc J; Wackenheim A
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1972; 13(0):875-82. PubMed ID: 4670791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic screening in the early detection of lung cancer.
    Stitik FP; Tockman MS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1978 Dec; 16(3):347-66. PubMed ID: 746141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast gradient and the detection of lung nodules.
    Kundel HL; Revesz G; Toto L
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 478790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A diaphragmatic compensating filter for hepatic angiography.
    Katsuda T; Hori S; Fujita M; Nakajima T; Horinouchi T; Kumatani Y; Nobezawa K; Yoshida J
    Radiogr Today; 1991 Mar; 57(646):20-3. PubMed ID: 2039591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diode array digital radiography: initial clinical experience.
    Sashin D; Sternglass EJ; Slasky BS; Bron KM; Herron JM; Kennedy WH; Shabason L; Boyer J; Pollitt AE; Latchaw RE; Girdany BR; Simpson RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1045-50. PubMed ID: 6983247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies.
    Ruess L; Uyehara CF; Shiels KC; Cho KH; O'Connor SC; Person DA; Whitton RK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Dec; 31(12):841-7. PubMed ID: 11727017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose reduction for chest CT with non-linear adaptive filters.
    Singh S; Digumarthy SR; Back A; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23185071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
    Patrux C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical advances in chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 7976874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Method of contrast densitometry of lung radiographs].
    Lupşa M
    Rev Ig Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol Pneumoftiziol Pneumoftiziol; 1984; 33(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 6097994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of film density on the radiologic detection of lung lesions.
    Kundel HL; Revesz G
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(2):199-200. PubMed ID: 856761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital processing of film radiographs.
    Sommer FG; Smathers RL; Wheat RL; Alvarez RE; Brody WR; Cassel DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jan; 144(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 3880625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review.
    Wenzel A
    Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8320010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.