141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17940130)
1. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 17057066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital chest radiography image quality assessment with dose reduction.
Grewal RK; Young N; Colins L; Karunnaratne N; Sabharwal N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22302464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 18259814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimisation of imaging technique used in direct digital radiography.
Roberts JA; Evans SC; Rees M
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 16926471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How reliable and safe is full-body low-dose radiography (LODOX Statscan) in detecting foreign bodies ingested by adults?
Mantokoudis G; Hegner S; Dubach P; Bonel HM; Senn P; Caversaccio MD; Exadaktylos AK
Emerg Med J; 2013 Jul; 30(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 22833594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiscale image processing and antiscatter grids in digital radiography.
Lo WY; Hornof WJ; Zwingenberger AL; Robertson ID
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2009; 50(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 19999338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
