141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17940130)
41. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology: image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Reiser M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Gmeinwieser J; Holzknecht N; Link J; Feuerbach S
J Thorac Imaging; 2000 Jul; 15(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 10928606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT.
Paul NS; Blobel J; Prezelj E; Burey P; Ursani A; Menezes RJ; Kashani H; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1363-80. PubMed ID: 20145292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Enhancement and compression of digital chest radiographs.
Cohn M; Trefler M; Young TY
J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 2299708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Harmonisation of the appearance of digital radiographs from different vendors by means of common external image processing.
Larsson L; Båth M; Engman EL; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):92-7. PubMed ID: 20185456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Utility of digital radiography for the screening of pneumoconiosis as compared to analog radiography: radiation dose, image quality, and pneumoconiosis classification.
Lee WJ; Choi BS
Health Phys; 2012 Jul; 103(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 22647918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Dose reduction in thorax radiography in simulated neonates with additional filtration and digital luminescence radiography.
Seifert H; Jesberger HJ; Schneider G; Rein L; Blass G; Limbach HG; Niewald M; Sitzmann FC; Kramann B
Acta Radiol; 1998 Sep; 39(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 9755700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical utility of postprocessed low-dose radiographs in skeletal imaging.
Kolck J; Ziegeler K; Walter-Rittel T; Hermann KGA; Hamm B; Beck A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210881. PubMed ID: 34919419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Restoration of Full Data from Sparse Data in Low-Dose Chest Digital Tomosynthesis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Lee D; Kim HJ
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Jun; 32(3):489-498. PubMed ID: 30238345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. An image-based technique to assess the perceptual quality of clinical chest radiographs.
Lin Y; Luo H; Dobbins JT; Page McAdams H; Wang X; Sehnert WJ; Barski L; Foos DH; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):7019-31. PubMed ID: 23127093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical aspects of quality criteria in digital radiography.
Vetter S; Strecker EP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11487839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Variable compensation technique for digital radiography of the chest.
Dobbins JT; Powell AO
Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 2798877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
