BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17941100)

  • 1. Face-to-face versus remote administration of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale using videoconference and telephone.
    Kobak KA; Williams JB; Jeglic E; Salvucci D; Sharp IR
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(11):913-9. PubMed ID: 17941100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of face-to-face and remote assessment of inter-rater reliability on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale via videoconferencing.
    Kobak KA; Williams JB; Engelhardt N
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Feb; 158(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 17961715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of face-to-face and videoconference administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
    Kobak KA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2004; 10(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 15273034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression.
    Zimmerman M; Posternak MA; Chelminski I
    J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 15458853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in adult outpatients.
    Yevtushenko VY; Belous AI; Yevtushenko YG; Gusinin SE; Buzik OJ; Agibalova TV
    Clin Ther; 2007 Nov; 29(11):2319-32. PubMed ID: 18158074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo response.
    Kobak KA; Leuchter A; DeBrota D; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Cook IA; Leon AC; Alpert J
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Apr; 30(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 20520295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia: a validation study with patients exhibiting early-onset dementia.
    Leontjevas R; van Hooren S; Mulders A
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2009 Jan; 17(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19092312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.
    Iannuzzo RW; Jaeger J; Goldberg JF; Kafantaris V; Sublette ME
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Nov; 145(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 17049379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can patients with dementia be assessed at a distance? The use of Telehealth and standardised assessments.
    Loh PK; Ramesh P; Maher S; Saligari J; Flicker L; Goldswain P
    Intern Med J; 2004 May; 34(5):239-42. PubMed ID: 15151669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed elderly: a meta-analysis.
    Heo M; Murphy CF; Meyers BS
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 15(10):899-905. PubMed ID: 17911366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of the Affective Self Rating Scale for manic, depressive, and mixed affective states.
    Adler M; Liberg B; Andersson S; Isacsson G; Hetta J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 18569776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of antidepressant response to fluvoxamine obtained using the three-factor structures of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale for major depressive disorders in Japanese patients.
    Higuchi H; Sato K; Yoshida K; Takahashi H; Kamata M; Otani K; Yamaguchi N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 62(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 18588590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA).
    Takahashi N; Tomita K; Higuchi T; Inada T
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 15079853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No predictors of antidepressant patient response to milnacipran were obtained using the three-factor structures of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale in Japanese patients with major depressive disorders.
    Higuchi H; Sato K; Yoshida K; Takahashi H; Kamata M; Otani K; Yamaguchi N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 62(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 18412843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A three-factor model of the MADRS in major depressive disorder.
    Suzuki A; Aoshima T; Fukasawa T; Yoshida K; Higuchi H; Shimizu T; Otani K
    Depress Anxiety; 2005; 21(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 15884092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
    Bunevicius A; Staniute M; Brozaitiene J; Pommer AM; Pop VJ; Montgomery SA; Bunevicius R
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Sep; 27(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 22869009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The feasibility of videoconferencing for neuropsychological assessments of rural youth experiencing early psychosis.
    Stain HJ; Payne K; Thienel R; Michie P; Carr V; Kelly B
    J Telemed Telecare; 2011; 17(6):328-31. PubMed ID: 21844174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of escitalopram treatment on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.
    Demyttenaere K; Andersen HF; Reines EH
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2008 Sep; 23(5):276-86. PubMed ID: 18703937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social anxiety symptoms across diagnoses among outpatients attending a tertiary care mood and anxiety disorders service.
    Graystone HJ; Garner MJ; Baldwin DS
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Apr; 114(1-3):305-9. PubMed ID: 18656267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low frequency (1-Hz), right prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with venlafaxine ER in the treatment of resistant depression: a double-blind, single-centre, randomized study.
    Bares M; Kopecek M; Novak T; Stopkova P; Sos P; Kozeny J; Brunovsky M; Höschl C
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Nov; 118(1-3):94-100. PubMed ID: 19249105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.