631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17941567)
1. The use of meta-synthesis in cardiovascular nursing research.
Woodend AK
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2007; 17(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 17941567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review.
Walsh D; Downe S
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Apr; 50(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 15788085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts.
Zimmer L
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Feb; 53(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 16441536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings.
Finfgeld-Connett D
J Adv Nurs; 2010 Feb; 66(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 20423407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The integrative review: updated methodology.
Whittemore R; Knafl K
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Dec; 52(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 16268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.
Davis K; Drey N; Gould D
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1386-400. PubMed ID: 19328488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appraising the quality of qualitative research.
Walsh D; Downe S
Midwifery; 2006 Jun; 22(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 16243416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The differences between meta-analysis and meta-study: part I.
Chamberlain B
Clin Nurse Spec; 2007; 21(5):229-30. PubMed ID: 17978621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The meta-analytic approach to research integration.
Onyskiw JE
Can J Nurs Res; 1996; 28(3):69-85. PubMed ID: 8997940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analytical issues for prevention intervention research.
Tobler N
NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():342-403. PubMed ID: 9243541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards a framework for establishing rigour in a discourse analysis of midwifery professionalisation.
Nixon A; Power C
Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 17298610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research methods: managing primary study quality in meta-analyses.
Conn VS; Rantz MJ
Res Nurs Health; 2003 Aug; 26(4):322-33. PubMed ID: 12884420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Case study: a bridge across the paradigms.
Luck L; Jackson D; Usher K
Nurs Inq; 2006 Jun; 13(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 16700753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis as a tool for evidence-based practice: an example using the Rice meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions.
Leonard EE; Wynd CA
Appl Nurs Res; 2008 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18226762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review.
Anthony S; Jack S
J Adv Nurs; 2009 Jun; 65(6):1171-81. PubMed ID: 19374670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical research methods in the nursing discipline framework].
Goulet C
Rech Soins Infirm; 1999 Dec; (59):20-6. PubMed ID: 12037839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
