290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17941773)
1. Rapid communication: effects of Steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes.
Abraham JB; Abdelshehid CS; Lee HJ; Box GN; Deane LA; Le T; Jellison F; Borin JF; Manipon A; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):985-92. PubMed ID: 17941773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparative study between the effect of CIDEX
Al Qahtani SH; Abdelhamied MH; AlMuhrij AH; Al Rawashada MY; Al Askar AM; Abdelhamid AM; Fath El-Bab TK; Galal EM; Eladawy MS
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):775-781. PubMed ID: 31087123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of Cidex OPA (0.55% ortho-phthalaldehyde) as an alternative to 2% glutaraldehyde for high-level disinfection of endoscopes.
Cooke RP; Goddard SV; Whymant-Morris A; Sherwood J; Chatterly R
J Hosp Infect; 2003 Jul; 54(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 12855240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost of being clean: A cost analysis of nasopharyngoscope reprocessing techniques.
Sowerby LJ; Rudmik L
Laryngoscope; 2018 Jan; 128(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 28815686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.
Bradford BD; Seiberling KA; Park FE; Hiebert JC; Chang DF
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 23680971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised single-blind comparison of the effectiveness of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) as an office-based fluid soak, with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde) using an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) as high-level disinfection for flexible cystoscopes.
Gilling PJ; Reuther RM; Addidle M; Lockhart MM; Frampton CM; Fraundorfer MR
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112 Suppl 2():69-73. PubMed ID: 24127679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of sterilization for flexible ureteroscopes: A real-world study.
Ofstead CL; Heymann OL; Quick MR; Johnson EA; Eiland JE; Wetzler HP
Am J Infect Control; 2017 Aug; 45(8):888-895. PubMed ID: 28625700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Evaluation of Longevity, the Factors that Affect it, and Damage Mechanisms.
Legemate JD; Kamphuis GM; Freund JE; Baard J; Zanetti SP; Catellani M; Oussoren HW; de la Rosette JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 29534873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-Use Ureteroscope Contamination after High Level Disinfection: Reprocessing Effectiveness and the Relation with Cumulative Ureteroscope Use.
Legemate JD; Kamphuis GM; Freund JE; Baard J; Oussoren HW; Spijkerman IJB; de la Rosette JJMCH
J Urol; 2019 Jun; 201(6):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 30707130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cost comparison of two reprocessing procedures of flexible ureteroscopes at the University Hospital of Dijon].
Muggeo E; Boissel A; Martin L; Sgro C; Michiels C
Prog Urol; 2015 May; 25(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 25775971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resilience of disposable endoscope optical fiber properties after repeat sterilization.
Johnson MT; Khemees TA; Knudsen BE
J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 22894548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sterilization of endoscopic instruments.
Sabnis RB; Bhattu A; Vijaykumar M
Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Mar; 24(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24451088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized Comparison of 3 High-Level Disinfection and Sterilization Procedures for Duodenoscopes.
Snyder GM; Wright SB; Smithey A; Mizrahi M; Sheppard M; Hirsch EB; Chuttani R; Heroux R; Yassa DS; Olafsdottir LB; Davis RB; Anastasiou J; Bapat V; Bidari K; Pleskow DK; Leffler D; Lane B; Chen A; Gold HS; Bartley A; King AD; Sawhney MS
Gastroenterology; 2017 Oct; 153(4):1018-1025. PubMed ID: 28711629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anaphylaxis following cystoscopy with equipment sterilized with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthalaldehyde): a review of two cases.
Cooper DE; White AA; Werkema AN; Auge BK
J Endourol; 2008 Sep; 22(9):2181-4. PubMed ID: 18811577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sporicidal activity of disinfectants as one possible cause for bacteria in patient-ready endoscopes.
Miner N; Harris V; Ebron T; Cao TD
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2007; 30(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 17724404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage.
Sung JC; Springhart WP; Marguet CG; L'Esperance JO; Tan YH; Albala DM; Preminger GM
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 16286103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
