290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17941773)
21. Does the cleaning technique influence the durability of the <9F flexible ureteroscope?
McDougall EM; Alberts G; Deal KJ; Nagy JM
J Endourol; 2001 Aug; 15(6):615-8. PubMed ID: 11552787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity.
Pietrow PK; Auge BK; Delvecchio FC; Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Albala DM; Preminger GM
Urology; 2002 Nov; 60(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 12429296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs.
Semins MJ; George S; Allaf ME; Matlaga BR
J Endourol; 2009 Jun; 23(6):903-5. PubMed ID: 19445639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: implications for clinical practice.
Monga M; Anderson KJ; Durfee W
J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 15253821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy of high-level disinfectants for reprocessing GI endoscopes in simulated-use testing.
Foliente RL; Kovacs BJ; Aprecio RM; Bains HJ; Kettering JD; Chen YK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Apr; 53(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 11275886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endoscope disinfection by ortho-phthalaldehyde in a clinical setting: an evaluation of reprocessing time and costs compared with glutaraldehyde.
Hession SM
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2003; 26(3):110-4. PubMed ID: 12811321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Durability of working channel in flexible ureteroscopes when inserting ureteroscopic devices.
Seto C; Ishiura Y; Egawa M; Komatsu K; Namiki M
J Endourol; 2006 Mar; 20(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 16548735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomised, single-blind comparison of high-level disinfectants for flexible nasendoscopes.
Hitchcock B; Moynan S; Frampton C; Reuther R; Gilling P; Rowe F
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):983-989. PubMed ID: 27669971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Disinfection of endoscopes: review of new chemical sterilants used for high-level disinfection.
Rutala WA; Weber DJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 9927274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.
Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The digital flexible ureteroscope: in vitro assessment of optical characteristics.
Zilberman DE; Lipkin ME; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Mancini JG; Raymundo ME; Zhong P; Preminger GM
J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 21361823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope.
Lusch A; Abdelshehid C; Hidas G; Osann KE; Okhunov Z; McDougall E; Landman J
J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 23402369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In-hospital evaluation of 7.5% hydrogen peroxide as a disinfectant for flexible endoscopes.
Sattar SA; Taylor YE; Paquette M; Rubino J
Can J Infect Control; 1996; 11(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 8868803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes.
Karaolides T; Bach C; Kachrilas S; Goyal A; Masood J; Buchholz N
Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 23465156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
