235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17942465)
1. Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Darlington GA; Donner A
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 17942465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
Klar N; Darlington G
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
Flynn TN; Peters TJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of rare events: an update and sensitivity analysis of cardiovascular events in randomized trials of rosiglitazone.
Dahabreh IJ; Economopoulos K
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 18375649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
Donner A; Klar N
Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported.
Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Elbourne DR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():9. PubMed ID: 15115554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial.
Dobbins TA; Simpson JM
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3835-46. PubMed ID: 12483770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.
Chakraborty H; Moore J; Hartwell TD
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 19386285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategies for analyzing multilevel cluster-randomized studies with binary outcomes collected at varying intervals of time.
Olsen MK; DeLong ER; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6055-71. PubMed ID: 18825655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
