235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17942465)
21. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
Heo M; Leon AC
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cluster-crossover design: a method for limiting clusters level effect in community-intervention studies.
Parienti JJ; Kuss O
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17110172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of clustered matched-pair data.
Durkalski VL; Palesch YY; Lipsitz SR; Rust PF
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2417-28. PubMed ID: 12872299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
Riley RD; Lambert PC; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Thijs L; Boutitie F
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1870-93. PubMed ID: 18069721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for binary data: methods and estimates from a cluster-randomized trial in primary care.
Yelland LN; Salter AB; Ryan P; Laurence CO
Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21335589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs.
Donner A; Klar N; Zou G
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):919-25. PubMed ID: 15606412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
Nixon RM; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cluster randomized trials produced similar results to individually randomized trials in a meta-analysis of enhanced care for depression.
Gilbody S; Bower P; Torgerson D; Richards D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 18177789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale.
Thompson SG; Warn DE; Turner RM
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 14748035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The merits of breaking the matches: a cautionary tale.
Donner A; Taljaard M; Klar N
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):2036-51. PubMed ID: 16927437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.
Laopaiboon M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Dec; 12(6):515-30. PubMed ID: 14653354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
O'Rourke K; Altman DG
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2733-42; author reply 2743. PubMed ID: 16118810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
