These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17942465)

  • 41. Four-fold table cell frequencies imputation in meta analysis.
    Di Pietrantonj C
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2299-322. PubMed ID: 16025540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Constructing intervals for the intracluster correlation coefficient using Bayesian modelling, and application in cluster randomized trials.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1443-56. PubMed ID: 16220510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.
    Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of permutation and mixed-model regression methods for the analysis of simulated data in the context of a group-randomized trial.
    Murray DM; Hannan PJ; Pals SP; McCowen RG; Baker WL; Blitstein JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):375-88. PubMed ID: 16143991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs.
    Pogue J; Walter SD; Yusuf S
    Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 19528133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
    Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A simple method to correct for the design effect in systematic reviews of trials using paired dichotomous data.
    Perera R; Glasziou P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 17689815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A method for the meta-analysis of mutually exclusive binary outcomes.
    Trikalinos TA; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4279-300. PubMed ID: 18416445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis.
    Gamble C; Hollis S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 15878471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimating effects from randomized trials with discontinuations: the need for intent-to-treat design and G-estimation.
    Greenland S; Lanes S; Jara M
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 18283074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Extension of the rank sum test for clustered data: two-group comparisons with group membership defined at the subunit level.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ; Lee ML
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1251-9. PubMed ID: 17156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cluster without fluster: The effect of correlated outcomes on inference in randomized clinical trials.
    Proschan M; Follmann D
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):795-809. PubMed ID: 17594680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An evaluation of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes.
    Riley RD; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 16526010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.