These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17944336)

  • 1. Preliminary laboratory evaluation of bicomponent customized zirconia abutments.
    Canullo L; Morgia P; Marinotti F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 17944336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations.
    Canullo L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 17944337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
    Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.
    Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
    Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
    Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
    Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of fabrication precision and mechanical reliability of 2 zirconia implant abutments.
    Kerstein RB; Radke J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1029-36. PubMed ID: 19216271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load-bearing capacity of custom-made versus prefabricated commercially available zirconia abutments.
    Hjerppe J; Lassila LV; Rakkolainen T; Narhi T; Vallittu PK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 21365048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants.
    Baixe S; Fauxpoint G; Arntz Y; Etienne O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 20556243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.