685 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17944964)
1. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs.
De Maeztu MA; Braceras I; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 18339518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.
Knobloch L; Larsen PA; Rashid B; Carr AB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15214218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.
Al-Nawas B; Hangen U; Duschner H; Krummenauer F; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17535330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone.
Ivanoff CJ; Widmark G; Johansson C; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12814308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses.
Todisco M; Trisi P
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 17009559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons.
Watzak G; Zechner W; Ulm C; Tangl S; Tepper G; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 16117764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible.
Salata LA; Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Dahlin C; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 17027235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces.
Lazzara RJ; Testori T; Trisi P; Porter SS; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Apr; 19(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 10635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histomorphologic and bone-to-implant contact evaluation of dual acid-etched and bioceramic grit-blasted implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Fernandes CA; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1877-83. PubMed ID: 20542367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
