994 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17944975)
1. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the polaroid and digital non-mydriatic cameras in the detection of referrable diabetic retinopathy in Australia.
Phiri R; Keeffe JE; Harper CA; Taylor HR
Diabet Med; 2006 Aug; 23(8):867-72. PubMed ID: 16911624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Romero P; Sagarra R; Ferrer J; Fernández-Ballart J; Baget M
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 20189672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate?
Baeza M; Orozco-Beltrán D; Gil-Guillen VF; Pedrera V; Ribera MC; Pertusa S; Merino J
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Mar; 63(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 19222628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study of the efficiency of a non-mydriatic retinal camera in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy].
Hernáez-Ortega MC; Soto-Pedre E; Vázquez JA; Gutiérrez MA; Asua J
Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Apr; 198(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 9633202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
