These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17945139)
1. Expanding the conversation on evaluation ethics. Schwandt TA Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 17945139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The priority of justice: a framework approach to ethics in program evaluation. Schweigert FJ Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 17822766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Where local and national evaluators meet: unintended threats to ethical evaluation practice. Rodi MS; Paget KD Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):416-21. PubMed ID: 17945142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Principles and particularity: the roles of cases in bioethics. Arras JD Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):983-1014. PubMed ID: 11653167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are principles ever properly ignored? A reply to Beauchamp on bioethical paradigms. Hanson K Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):975-81. PubMed ID: 11653166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Common moral priorities and cultural diversities. Sass HM Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2003 May; 4(1-2):6-21. PubMed ID: 15011661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical theory, "common morality," and professional obligations. Alexandra A; Miller S Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19199076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies. de Vries R; Gordijn B Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 19338520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two concepts of empirical ethics. Parker M Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):202-13. PubMed ID: 19338521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foundation officers, evaluation, and ethical problems: a pilot investigation. Morris M Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 17945141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behind the Wall paper. Loughlin M Health Care Anal; 1994 Feb; 2(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 10134372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trustworthiness in evaluation practice: an emphasis on the relational. Rallis SF; Rossman GB; Gajda R Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 17945140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A response to Beauchamp. Smith DH Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):973-4. PubMed ID: 11653165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives on ethics. Parker C J Med Ethics; 2007 Jan; 33(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 17209105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What should other healthcare professions learn from nursing ethics. Holm S Nurs Philos; 2006 Jul; 7(3):165-74. PubMed ID: 16774603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How experience confronts ethics. Hoffmaster B; Hooker C Bioethics; 2009 May; 23(4):214-25. PubMed ID: 19338522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical research law in Jordan: an ethical analysis. Ramahi I; Silverman H Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 18302540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A crisis in chronic pain care: an ethical analysis. Part two: proposed structure and function of an ethics of pain medicine. Giordano J; Schatman ME Pain Physician; 2008; 11(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 18850024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]