These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17945686)

  • 1. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microcalcification detection based on wavelet domain hidden markov tree model: study for inclusion to computer aided diagnostic prompting system.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17654922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications.
    Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN; Edwards A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1278-85. PubMed ID: 16229415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
    Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic detection of microcalcifications with multi-fractal spectrum.
    Ding Y; Dai H; Zhang H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3049-54. PubMed ID: 25227013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme using a filter bank for detection of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Yamamoto K; Watanabe R; Namba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Feb; 53(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 16485756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Ho CP; Tromans C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3166-9. PubMed ID: 21096808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shape analysis of microcalcifications using Radon transform.
    Bocchi L; Nori J
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jul; 29(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 17081794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks.
    Bocchi L; Coppini G; Nori J; Valli G
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 15121055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
    Elter M; Horsch A
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration.
    Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.