These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17945740)
1. Spiculation-preserving polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors. Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Daloia de Carvalho J; Anchieta Santiago S Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2791-4. PubMed ID: 17945740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules. Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors. Guliato D; de Carvalho JD; Rangayyan RM; Santiago SA J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 17972137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of fractal analysis to mammography. Raguso G; Ancona A; Chieppa L; L'abbate S; Pepe ML; Mangieri F; De Palo M; Rangayyan RM Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3182-5. PubMed ID: 21096599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance. Jiang L; Song E; Xu X; Ma G; Zheng B Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1534-44. PubMed ID: 19000870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms. Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours. Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography. Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses. Singh S; Bovis K IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis. Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Rangayyan RM; Mudigonda NR; Desautels JE Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 11094803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours. Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms via the power spectra of their signatures. Rangayyan RM; Oloumi F; Nguyen TM Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6737-40. PubMed ID: 21095828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography. Muralidhar GS; Bovik AC; Giese JD; Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Haygood TM; Stephens TW; Markey MK IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80. PubMed ID: 20529728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation and comparison of the performance of state of the art approaches for the detection of spiculated masses in mammograms. Kage A; Elter M; Wittenberg T Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3773-6. PubMed ID: 18002819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms. Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis. Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses. Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography. Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]