BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17946258)

  • 1. Autofocusing for automated microscopic evaluation of blood smear and pap smear.
    Liu XY; Wang WH; Sun Y
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4718-21. PubMed ID: 17946258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic evaluation of autofocusing for automated microscopic analysis of blood smear and pap smear.
    Liu XY; Wang WH; Sun Y
    J Microsc; 2007 Jul; 227(Pt 1):15-23. PubMed ID: 17635655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated detection and analysis of fluorescent in situ hybridization spots depicted in digital microscopic images of Pap-smear specimens.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Zhang R; Mulvihill JJ; Chen WR; Liu H
    J Biomed Opt; 2009; 14(2):021002. PubMed ID: 19405715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated segmentation of free-lying cell nuclei in Pap smears for malignancy-associated change analysis.
    Moshavegh R; Ehteshami Bejnordi B; Mehnert A; Sujathan K; Malm P; Bengtsson E
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5372-5. PubMed ID: 23367143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple and robust image-based autofocusing for digital microscopy.
    Yazdanfar S; Kenny KB; Tasimi K; Corwin AD; Dixon EL; Filkins RJ
    Opt Express; 2008 Jun; 16(12):8670-7. PubMed ID: 18545580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Edge enhancement nucleus and cytoplast contour detector of cervical smear images.
    Yang-Mao SF; Chan YK; Chu YP
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Apr; 38(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 18348920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated identification of cancerous smears using various competitive intelligent techniques.
    Dounias G; Bjerregaard B; Jantzen J; Tsakonas A; Ampazis N; Panagi G; Panourgias E
    Oncol Rep; 2006; 15 Spec no.():1001-6. PubMed ID: 16525690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Convolution Neural Network for Malignancy Detection and Classification in Microscopic Uterine Cervix Cell Images.
    P B S; Faruqi F; K S H; Kudva R
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Nov; 20(11):3447-3456. PubMed ID: 31759371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DeepCyto: a hybrid framework for cervical cancer classification by using deep feature fusion of cytology images.
    Shinde S; Kalbhor M; Wajire P
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(7):6415-6434. PubMed ID: 35730264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer diagnosis based on modified uniform local ternary patterns and feed forward multilayer network optimized by genetic algorithm.
    Fekri-Ershad S; Ramakrishnan S
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105392. PubMed ID: 35299043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 30755214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis from Pap smear images.
    Momenzadeh M; Sehhati M; Mehri Dehnavi A; Talebi A; Rabbani H
    J Microsc; 2017 Sep; 267(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 28419509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation of bright-field microscopy images depicting pap-smear specimen.
    Malm P; Brun A; Bengtsson E
    Cytometry A; 2015 Mar; 87(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 25573002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated screening of cervical cytology specimens.
    Birdsong GG
    Hum Pathol; 1996 May; 27(5):468-81. PubMed ID: 8621186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Papanicolaou smear: its impact on the promotion of women's health.
    Foulks MJ
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1998; 27(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 9684199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of the Papanicolaou smear in diagnosis of chlamydial infections.
    Arroyo G; Linnemann C; Wesseler T
    Sex Transm Dis; 1989; 16(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2667150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systolic algorithm for Euclidean distance transform.
    Miyazawa M; Zeng P; Iso N; Hirata T
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Jul; 28(7):1127-34. PubMed ID: 16792101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
    van Erp EJ; Dersjant-Roorda MC; Arentz NP; Stijnen T; Trimbos JB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Oct; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2572484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of autofocus algorithms for tuberculosis microscopy.
    Russell MJ; Douglas TS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3489-92. PubMed ID: 18002748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.