These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17946807)

  • 1. Nonlinear spectrum compression for the hearing impaired via a frequency-domain processing algorithm.
    Paarmann LD
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():240-3. PubMed ID: 17946807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Harmonic Frequency Lowering: Effects on the Perception of Music Detail and Sound Quality.
    Kirchberger M; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing.
    Jürgens T; Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Meddis R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 26918797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of frequency compression in hearing aids on speech intelligibility and subjective sound quality].
    Leifholz M; Margolf-Hackl S; Kreikemeier S; Kiessling J
    HNO; 2013 Apr; 61(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 23508859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
    Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
    Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiresolutional modification of speech signals for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Erogul O; Karagöz I
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1999 Jul; 36(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 10659806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
    Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
    Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audio-visual perception of compressed speech by profoundly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Drullman R; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1997; 36(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 9193734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.