89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1794685)
1. [Breast cancer grading by automated image processing].
Seufert RJ; Casper FW; Herzog RE; Knapstein PG
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Dec; 51(12):980-3. PubMed ID: 1794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of nuclear image cytometry, histopathological grading and DNA cytometry to make breast cancer prognosis more objective.
Theissig F; Dimmer V; Haroske G; Kunze KD; Meyer W
Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Nov; 3(6):351-60. PubMed ID: 1751402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Grading, staging, DNA content and prognosis of invasive ductal breast cancer].
Theissig F; Kunze KD; Haroske G; Meyer W; Dimmer V
Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(7):433-9. PubMed ID: 2164288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Image analysis of DNA cytometry for assessing prognosis after resection of esophageal cancer].
Böttger T; Störkel S; Stöckle M; Wahl W; Heintz A; Jugenheimer M; Effenberger-Kim O; Vinh T; Junginger T
Chirurg; 1991 Jun; 62(6):467-72; discussion 472-3. PubMed ID: 1655366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided classification of breast cancer nuclei.
Schnorrenberg F; Pattichis CS; Schizas CN; Kyriacou K; Vassiliou M
Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):147-61. PubMed ID: 8885093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Morphological possibilities for objectification of the prognosis for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast].
Theissig F; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Kunze KD; Meyer W
Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 1718409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative DNA analysis of breast cancer by flow cytometry and image analysis.
Borgiani L; Cogorno P; Toso F; Gallo L; Buccaran G; Rovida S; Canepa M
Pathologica; 1994 Aug; 86(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 7535909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [S-phase fraction and proportion of cells with high DNA content as prognostic factors of lymph node negative breast cancer].
Wagner T; Adler A; Kubista E
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(24):712-4. PubMed ID: 8116307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of morphological parameters and flow cytometric DNA analysis in carcinoma of the breast.
Visscher DW; Zarbo RJ; Greenawald KA; Crissman JD
Pathol Annu; 1990; 25 Pt 1():171-210. PubMed ID: 2153277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cytomorphology and prognosis of invasive breast cancer--recommendation for cytologic grading and personal experiences].
Schöndorf NK; Neis KJ; Gräber S
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1985; 69():532-6. PubMed ID: 3006393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluorescence-based analysis of DNA ploidy and cell proliferation within fine-needle samplings of breast tumors: a new approach using automated image cytometry.
Truong K; Vielh P; Malfoy B; Klijanienko J; Dutrillaux B; Bourgeois CA
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):309-16. PubMed ID: 9801206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative study of ductal breast cancer progression: nuclear signatures for evaluation of progression grade.
Mombello A; Mariuzzi L; Morelli L; Granchelli G; Rucco V; Tarocco E; da Silva VD; Thompson D; Bartels HG; Bartels PH; Mariuzzi G
Adv Clin Path; 2001 Jul; 5(3):59-70. PubMed ID: 11753877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Current status of grading in breast cancer].
Bässler R; Böcker W; Hermanek P; Pickartz H; Prechtel K; Schauer A; Schnürch HG; Stegner HE
Pathologe; 1992 May; 13(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 1620676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Frequency distribution, microscopic image analysis and grading of mammary carcinoma].
Guski H; Winzer KJ; Seidenfaden U; Hufnagl P; Wolf G
Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 1718410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cellular DNA contact and its correlation with histopathological prognostic parameters in carcinoma of the breast.
Chaturvedi S; Singh S; Khanna HD; Khanna S; Khanna R
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1998 Jul; 41(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 9805857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of the cytological grading, the nuclear area, the DNA index and the DNA histogram type in the setting up of a score for ductal breast carcinoma.
Budel V; Merle S; Gasperin P; Collet JF; De Maublanc MA; Kiss R
Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(6B):2845-51. PubMed ID: 7532932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative study of the prognosis content of grading and morphometry in breast cancers].
Schnürch HG; Ellerbrok G; Bender HG; Beck L
Pathologe; 1989 Mar; 10(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 2717542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective nuclear grading for node-negative breast cancer patients: comparison of quasi-3D and 2D image-analysis based on light microscopic images.
Albert R; Müller JG; Kristen P; Harms H
Lab Invest; 1998 Mar; 78(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 9520938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunocytochemistry and image cytometry of progesterone receptors in breast carcinoma imprints. Expression of tissular and cellular heterogeneity: relations to biochemical assay, clinical and histological parameters and DNA analysis.
Seigneurin D; Cohen O; Louis J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Apr; 1(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 2484853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance (relapse, non-relapse) of nuclear shape parameters in lymph node negative breast cancer.
Umbricht C; Oberholzer M; Gschwind R; Christen H; Torhorst J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Feb; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2562217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
