BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17947768)

  • 21. Comparison of colonic neoplasia detection rates in patients screened inside and outside the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
    Whitcher S; Magnusson M; Gani J; Oldmeadow C; Pockney PG
    Med J Aust; 2020 Apr; 212(6):275-276. PubMed ID: 32058586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
    Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: diagnostic yield and safety in guidelines.
    Grassini M; Verna C; Niola P; Navino M; Battaglia E; Bassotti G
    World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Mar; 13(12):1816-9; discussion 1819. PubMed ID: 17465472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Longitudinal Rates of Colon Cancer Screening Use in Winnipeg, Canada: The Experience of a Universal Health-Care System with an Organized Colon Screening Program.
    Decker KM; Demers AA; Nugent Z; Biswanger N; Singh H
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 110(12):1640-6. PubMed ID: 26169513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Profile in community cooperation: Delaware big in fighting cancer.
    Botvin JD
    Profiles Healthc Mark; 2005; 21(3):16-22, 3. PubMed ID: 15971724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy.
    Graham RA; Wang S; Catalano PJ; Haller DG
    Ann Surg; 1998 Jul; 228(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9671067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening colonoscopy: has the time come?
    Neugut AI; Forde KA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1988 Mar; 83(3):295-7. PubMed ID: 3278596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Economic impact of surveillance.
    Ransohoff DF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 2):S67-71. PubMed ID: 10049452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Office Visits Prior to Screening Colonoscopy.
    Leow JJ; Trinh QD; McNabb-Baltar J
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(24):2734. PubMed ID: 27367776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Office Visits Prior to Screening Colonoscopy--Reply.
    Riggs KR; Shin EJ; Segal JB
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(24):2734-5. PubMed ID: 27367777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Costly Colonoscopy Leads to a Delay in Diagnosis.
    AORN J; 2019 Apr; 109(4):539-541. PubMed ID: 30919422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The economic implications of radiologic screening for colonic cancer.
    Gelfand DW; Ott DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 May; 156(5):939-43. PubMed ID: 1902013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for colon cancer--can we afford colonoscopy?
    Detsky AS
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Aug; 345(8):607-8. PubMed ID: 11529216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-saving analysis of screening colonoscopy in Germany.
    Sieg A; Brenner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 17874356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detection rate of proximal serrated lesions: A new quality indicator for colonoscopy?
    Barret M; Chaussade S; Coriat R
    Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Jun; 47(6):441-2. PubMed ID: 25921276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound, CT and colonoscopy of colonic cancer.
    Loftus WK; Metreweli C; Sung JJ; Yang WT; Leung VK; Set PA
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 72(854):144-8. PubMed ID: 10365063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can DNA aneuploidy study make surveillance colonoscopy more cost effective.
    Seenu V; Goel A
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1993; 14(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 8342249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal colonic neoplasms: a cost benefit analysis of different diagnostic protocols.
    Arrigoni A; Pennazio M; Rossini FP
    Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(2):563-7. PubMed ID: 7763038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening for large bowel cancer.
    Barnes R
    Practitioner; 1989 May; 233(1468):691-4. PubMed ID: 2513566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening.
    Harewood GC; Lieberman DA
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jan; 2(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 15017635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.