These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1794812)

  • 1. [Comparative study of various perimetry strategies].
    Vivell PM; Lachenmayr BJ; Zimmermann P
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 1794812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
    Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry.
    Weber J; Klimaschka T
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7612076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sensitivity and specificity of masked field campimetry].
    Schiefer U; Pfau U; Selbmann HK; Wilhelm H; Zrenner E
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 7780274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
    Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of three methods for abbreviating G1 examinations.
    Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1989; 33(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 2677457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of faulty refraction and artificial media opacities on visual acuity perimetry].
    Hölzl MJ; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1794825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Computer perimetry--rapid TOP (tendency oriented perimetry) and normal threshold methods in clinical practice--comparison of results].
    Kratochvilová P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2002 May; 58(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 12087665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
    Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A new strategy for automated static perimetry].
    Weber J
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2323694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma].
    Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study].
    Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect.
    Kondo Y; Yamamoto T; Sato Y; Matsubara M; Kitazawa Y
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Aug; 7(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 9713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.