These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17948822)

  • 1. [Quality of care a matter of experience].
    Gouma DJ; Busch OR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(38):2082-6. PubMed ID: 17948822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Relationship between volume and quality of care for surgical interventions; results of a literature review].
    Burgers JS; Wittenberg J; Kallewaard M; van Croonenborg JJ; van Barneveld TA; van Everdingen JJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(38):2105-10. PubMed ID: 17948827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Performance indicators as a measure of the quality of medical care: rhetoric and reality].
    Giard RW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Dec; 149(49):2715-9. PubMed ID: 16375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Leapfrog Initiative: a potential threat to surgical education.
    Barone JE; Tucker JB; Bull SM
    Curr Surg; 2003; 60(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 14972300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case-based quality management system for surgery, a bottom up approach.
    de Vries BC; Hofdijk WJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1994; 14():91-7. PubMed ID: 10172819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the quality of surgical care.
    Fink AS; Itani KM; Campbell DC
    Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):837-52, vi. PubMed ID: 17888783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality-of-care indicators for oesophageal cancer surgery: A review.
    Courrech Staal EF; Wouters MW; Boot H; Tollenaar RA; van Sandick JW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1035-43. PubMed ID: 20846818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance measures for pneumonia: are they valuable, and are process measures adequate?
    Bratzler DW; Nsa W; Houck PM
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2007 Apr; 20(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 17496578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Quality of Cancer Care initiative in the Netherlands.
    Wouters MW; Jansen-Landheer ML; van de Velde CJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S3-S13. PubMed ID: 20576399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measures of surgical quality: what will patients know by 2005?
    Broder MS; Payne-Simon L; Brook RH
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Jun; 11(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 15869551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Candidate quality of care indicators for localized bladder cancer.
    Cooperberg MR; Porter MP; Konety BR
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19573775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based perspectives on pay for performance and quality of patient care and outcomes in emergency medicine.
    Glickman SW; Schulman KA; Peterson ED; Hocker MB; Cairns CB
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 May; 51(5):622-31. PubMed ID: 18358566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality improvement of paediatric care in the Netherlands.
    Schulpen TW; Lombarts KM
    Arch Dis Child; 2007 Jul; 92(7):633-6. PubMed ID: 17588977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary assessment of pediatric health care quality and patient safety in the United States using readily available administrative data.
    McDonald KM; Davies SM; Haberland CA; Geppert JJ; Ku A; Romano PS
    Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):e416-25. PubMed ID: 18676529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Michigan surgical quality collaborative: will a statewide quality improvement initiative pay for itself?
    Englesbe MJ; Dimick JB; Sonnenday CJ; Share DA; Campbell DA
    Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):1100-3. PubMed ID: 18043116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The critical limitations of volume-outcome analysis.
    Ellison L
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 19573773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining process indicators to evaluate quality of care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: are scores consistent with short-term outcome?
    Kolfschoten NE; Gooiker GA; Bastiaannet E; van Leersum NJ; van de Velde CJ; Eddes EH; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Kievit J; van der Harst E; Wiggers T; Wouters MW; Tollenaar RA;
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Jun; 21(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 22491528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exporting excellence for Whipple resection to refine the Leapfrog Initiative.
    Maa J; Gosnell JE; Gibbs VC; Harris HW
    J Surg Res; 2007 Apr; 138(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 17292411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.