393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17948827)
1. [Relationship between volume and quality of care for surgical interventions; results of a literature review].
Burgers JS; Wittenberg J; Kallewaard M; van Croonenborg JJ; van Barneveld TA; van Everdingen JJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(38):2105-10. PubMed ID: 17948827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality of care a matter of experience].
Gouma DJ; Busch OR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(38):2082-6. PubMed ID: 17948822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.
Nathan H; Cameron JL; Choti MA; Schulick RD; Pawlik TM
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):528-38. PubMed ID: 19476786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.
Birkmeyer JD; Dimick JB
Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 15179361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The "occasional open heart surgeon" revisited.
Carey JS; Parker JP; Brandeau C; Li Z
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1254-60. PubMed ID: 18544365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality-of-care indicators for oesophageal cancer surgery: A review.
Courrech Staal EF; Wouters MW; Boot H; Tollenaar RA; van Sandick JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1035-43. PubMed ID: 20846818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.
Joseph B; Morton JM; Hernandez-Boussard T; Rubinfeld I; Faraj C; Velanovich V
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 19476785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between hospital case volume and outcome from carotid endartectomy in England from 2000 to 2005.
Holt PJ; Poloniecki JD; Loftus IM; Thompson MM
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 34(6):646-54. PubMed ID: 17892955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Centralisation of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and evaluation in the Netherlands].
van Heek NT; Kuhlmann KF; Scholten RJ; de Castro SM; Busch OR; van Gulik TM; Obertop H; Gouma DJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Apr; 150(14):791-8. PubMed ID: 16649399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small rural hospitals and high-risk operations: how would regionalization affect surgical volume and hospital revenue?
Chappel AR; Zuckerman RS; Finlayson SR
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 17084319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measures of surgical quality: what will patients know by 2005?
Broder MS; Payne-Simon L; Brook RH
J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Jun; 11(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 15869551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.
Gasper WJ; Glidden DV; Jin C; Way LW; Patti MG
Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 19730178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Are there relevant minimum procedure volumes in trauma and orthopedic surgery?].
Schulze Raestrup U; Smektala R
Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Dec; 131(6):483-92. PubMed ID: 17206568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery.
Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Feinglass JM; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Talamonti MS; Ko CY
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 26(28):4626-33. PubMed ID: 18574159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Society of University Surgeons position statement on the volume-outcome relationship for surgical procedures.
Berger DH; Ko CY; Spain DA
Surgery; 2003 Jul; 134(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12874580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Quality of Cancer Care initiative in the Netherlands.
Wouters MW; Jansen-Landheer ML; van de Velde CJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S3-S13. PubMed ID: 20576399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of case load and the extent of resection on the quality of treatment outcome in gastric cancer.
Meyer HJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Aug; 31(6):595-604. PubMed ID: 15919174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
