These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17949525)

  • 1. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Msezane LP; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
    Can J Urol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701. PubMed ID: 17949525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Schaeffer AJ; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 17320668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
    Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
    Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Marchetti PE; Shikanov S; Razmaria AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 21071070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.