249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17949525)
1. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Msezane LP; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
Can J Urol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701. PubMed ID: 17949525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Schaeffer AJ; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 17320668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Marchetti PE; Shikanov S; Razmaria AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 21071070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW
BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
