These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17950874)

  • 1. Neural mechanisms of visual categorization: insights from neurophysiology.
    Freedman DJ; Miller EK
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2008; 32(2):311-29. PubMed ID: 17950874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience-dependent representation of visual categories in parietal cortex.
    Freedman DJ; Assad JA
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):85-8. PubMed ID: 16936716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
    Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of medial temporal lobe and caudate contributions to visual category learning.
    Nomura EM; Reber PJ
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2008; 32(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 17868867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The representation of perceived shape similarity and its role for category learning in monkeys: a modeling study.
    Op de Beeck HP; Wagemans J; Vogels R
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):598-610. PubMed ID: 18199467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural substrates for visual pattern recognition learning in Igo.
    Itoh K; Kitamura H; Fujii Y; Nakada T
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():162-73. PubMed ID: 18621033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy.
    Ullman S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Feb; 11(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 17188555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
    Benard J; Stach S; Giurfa M
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs.
    Range F; Aust U; Steurer M; Huber L
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Apr; 11(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 18026761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual binding through reentrant connectivity and dynamic synchronization in a brain-based device.
    Seth AK; McKinstry JL; Edelman GM; Krichmar JL
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Nov; 14(11):1185-99. PubMed ID: 15142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: a behavioral and neurophysiological study.
    Scott LS; Tanaka JW; Sheinberg DL; Curran T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1210():204-15. PubMed ID: 18417106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of category specificity in infancy--What can we learn from electrophysiology?
    Hoehl S
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Mar; 83():114-122. PubMed ID: 26305018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grey-matter differences related to true and false recognition of emotionally charged stimuli - a voxel based morphometry study.
    Marchewka A; Jednoróg K; Nowicka A; Brechmann A; Grabowska A
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2009 Jul; 92(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 19292997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Untangling invariant object recognition.
    DiCarlo JJ; Cox DD
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Aug; 11(8):333-41. PubMed ID: 17631409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional connections between visual areas in extracting object features critical for a visual categorization task.
    Soga M; Kashimori Y
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):337-47. PubMed ID: 19027775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.