BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17951206)

  • 1. Does using a higher cutoff for the percentage of positive cells improve the specificity of HER-2 immunohistochemical analysis in breast carcinoma?
    Hameed O; Chhieng DC; Adams AL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Nov; 128(5):825-9. PubMed ID: 17951206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER-2 status in routine practice.
    Dolan M; Snover D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 May; 123(5):766-70. PubMed ID: 15981817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HER-2 testing in breast cancer using immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a single-institution experience of 2,279 cases and comparison of dual-color and single-color scoring.
    Lal P; Salazar PA; Hudis CA; Ladanyi M; Chen B
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 15151202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of immunohistochemistry by automated cellular imaging system (ACIS) versus fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the evaluation of HER-2/neu expression in primary breast carcinoma.
    Tawfik OW; Kimler BF; Davis M; Donahue JK; Persons DL; Fan F; Hagemeister S; Thomas P; Connor C; Jewell W; Fabian CJ
    Histopathology; 2006 Feb; 48(3):258-67. PubMed ID: 16430472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a higher cutoff for the percentage of HER2+ cells decreases interobserver variability in the interpretation of HER2 immunohistochemical analysis.
    Hameed O; Adams AL; Baker AC; Balmer NE; Bell WC; Burford HN; Chhieng DC; Jhala NC; Klein MJ; Winokur T
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Sep; 130(3):425-7. PubMed ID: 18701416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: biologic and methodologic considerations.
    Sauter G; Lee J; Bartlett JM; Slamon DJ; Press MF
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(8):1323-33. PubMed ID: 19204209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic evaluation of HER-2 as a molecular target: an assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of laboratory testing in large, prospective, randomized clinical trials.
    Press MF; Sauter G; Bernstein L; Villalobos IE; Mirlacher M; Zhou JY; Wardeh R; Li YT; Guzman R; Ma Y; Sullivan-Halley J; Santiago A; Park JM; Riva A; Slamon DJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 11(18):6598-607. PubMed ID: 16166438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justification of the change from 10% to 30% for the immunohistochemical HER2 Scoring criterion in breast cancer.
    Liu YH; Xu FP; Rao JY; Zhuang HG; Luo XL; Li L; Luo DL; Zhang F; Xu J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jul; 132(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19864236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced accuracy and reliability of HER-2/neu immunohistochemical scoring using digital microscopy.
    Bloom K; Harrington D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):620-30. PubMed ID: 15151201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Borderline HER-2 breast cancer cases: histochemical versus real-time PCR analysis and impact of different cut-off values.
    Monego G; Arena V; Maggiano N; Costarelli L; Crescenzi A; Zelano G; Amini M; Capelli A; Carbone A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 17558895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HER-2/neu analysis in breast cancer bone metastases.
    Zustin J; Boddin K; Tsourlakis MC; Burandt E; Mirlacher M; Jaenicke F; Izbicki J; Ruether W; Rueger JM; Bokemeyer C; Simon R; Sauter G
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 19474354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of HER-2 gene status in gastric carcinoma using immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
    Kim MA; Jung EJ; Lee HS; Lee HE; Jeon YK; Yang HK; Kim WH
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1386-93. PubMed ID: 17555797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue microarray technology in the routine assessment of HER-2 status in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study of the use of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Graham AD; Faratian D; Rae F; Thomas JS
    Histopathology; 2008 Jun; 52(7):847-55. PubMed ID: 18494613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer. Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS)-assisted quantitation of immunohistochemical assay achieves high accuracy in comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization assay as the standard.
    Wang S; Saboorian MH; Frenkel EP; Haley BB; Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan S; Wians FH; Hynan L; Ashfaq R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 116(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 11601134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical evaluation of HER-2 status: which test to use?
    Bartlett J; Mallon E; Cooke T
    J Pathol; 2003 Apr; 199(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 12635130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER-2 status in routine practice.
    Egervari K; Szollosi Z; Nemes Z; Kaczur V
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jan; 125(1):155-6. PubMed ID: 16483004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Achieving 95% cross-methodological concordance in HER2 testing: causes and implications of discordant cases.
    Grimm EE; Schmidt RA; Swanson PE; Dintzis SM; Allison KH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Aug; 134(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20660333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential for HER-2/neu molecular targeted therapy for invasive bladder carcinoma: comparative study of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization.
    Matsubara H; Yamada Y; Naruse K; Nakamura K; Aoki S; Taki T; Tobiume M; Zennami K; Katsuda R; Honda N
    Oncol Rep; 2008 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18097576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased risk of brain metastases in patients with HER-2/neu-positive breast carcinoma.
    Altaha R; Crowell E; Hobbs G; Higa G; Abraham J
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):442-3. PubMed ID: 15578684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative justification of the change from 10% to 30% for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 scoring in the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer and its implications for tissue microarray based assessment of outcome.
    Moeder CB; Giltnane JM; Harigopal M; Molinaro A; Robinson A; Gelmon K; Huntsman D; Camp RL; Rimm DL; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 25(34):5418-25. PubMed ID: 18048824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.