268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17952009)
41. Rarebit and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in children and young adults.
Martin L
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Dec; 83(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 16396643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Brush MB; Chen PP
J Glaucoma; 2004 Aug; 13(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 15226654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Non-conventional perimetric methods in the detection of early glaucomatous functional damage.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):835-42. PubMed ID: 19696803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The sensitivity and specificity of TOP, FDP and GDX in screening for early glaucoma.
Fabré K; Michiels I; Zeyen T
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2000; 275():17-23. PubMed ID: 10853303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests.
Gardiner SK; Anderson DR; Fingeret M; McSoley JJ; Johnson CA
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):432-7. PubMed ID: 16840859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Possible association between heavy computer users and glaucomatous visual field abnormalities: a cross sectional study in Japanese workers.
Tatemichi M; Nakano T; Tanaka K; Hayashi T; Nawa T; Miyamoto T; Hiro H; Sugita M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Dec; 58(12):1021-7. PubMed ID: 15547065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal children.
Quinn LM; Gardiner SK; Wheeler DT; Newkirk M; Johnson CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 17046702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Normal age-related sensitivity loss for a variety of visual functions throughout the visual field.
Gardiner SK; Johnson CA; Spry PG
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):438-43. PubMed ID: 16840869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias.
Taravati P; Woodward KR; Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Redline D; Carolan J; Huang CQ; Wall M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Munoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz De Zarate B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-745. PubMed ID: 28221437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
Miranda MA; Henson DB
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in detection of glaucoma among glaucoma suspects.
Patyal S; Kotwal A; Banarji A; Gurunadh VS
Med J Armed Forces India; 2014 Oct; 70(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 25382906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [High-technological screening for glaucoma].
Boĭko EV; Simakova IL; Kuz'micheva OV; Mechetin AA; Tselomudryĭ AI; Filina EV
Voen Med Zh; 2010 Feb; 331(2):23-6. PubMed ID: 20536045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Retinal nerve fiber layer images captured by GDx-VCC in early diagnosis of glaucoma.
Zheng W; Baohua C; Qun C; Zhi Q; Hong D
Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 18097175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.
Casson R; James B; Rubinstein A; Ali H
Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Mar; 85(3):360-2. PubMed ID: 11222348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.
Doozandeh A; Irandoost F; Mirzajani A; Yazdani S; Pakravan M; Esfandiari H
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 29392149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Computerized perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Mocanu C
Oftalmologia; 1993; 37(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 8338826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Structure-function relationship depends on glaucoma severity.
Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Pablo LE; Armas-Dominguez K; de la Vega RR; Ferreras A; de la Rosa MG
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 93(9):1195-9. PubMed ID: 19493858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Glaucomatous patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers.
Bowd C; Weinreb RN; Balasubramanian M; Lee I; Jang G; Yousefi S; Zangwill LM; Medeiros FA; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Goldbaum MH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85941. PubMed ID: 24497932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
