These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17952009)

  • 81. Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma.
    Chang RT; Knight OJ; Feuer WJ; Budenz DL
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2294-9. PubMed ID: 19800694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms in glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Gotoh Y; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 49(12):5636-44. PubMed ID: 18641287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [Correlation of the Heidelberg retinal tomograph, evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer and perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Skorkovská S; Michálek J; Sedlacík M; Masková Z; Kocí J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2007 Nov; 63(6):403-14. PubMed ID: 18062164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry?
    Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1043-8. PubMed ID: 18981919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Frequency Doubling Technology vs Standard Automated Perimetry in Ocular Hypertensive Patients.
    Giuffrè I
    Open Ophthalmol J; 2009 Mar; 3():6-9. PubMed ID: 19554222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. [Comparison of the Results of the Flicker Perimetry (Prototype versus Commercial Perimeter)].
    Zimmermann N; Hess A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2017 Sep; 234(9):1169-1173. PubMed ID: 27508889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Chauhan BC; Lieberman MF; Cunliffe I; Hyman L; Leske MC
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1557-65. PubMed ID: 18378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Learning effect, normal range, and test-retest variability of Frequency Doubling Perimetry as a function of age, perimetric experience, and the presence or absence of glaucoma.
    Heeg GP; Ponsioen TL; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Nov; 23(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 14622357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. [Continuous profile perimetry].
    Schubart P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Feb; 196(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2325348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. HRT III glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression across the glaucoma spectrum.
    Reddy S; Xing D; Arthur SN; Harizman N; Dorairaj S; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 19525726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Detection of early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT).
    Nouri-Mahdavi K; Nikkhou K; Hoffman DC; Law SK; Caprioli J
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18414102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry, scanning laser tomography, and their combination in a glaucoma screening trial.
    Tóth M; Kóthy P; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 19092459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. [Correlation between structural and functional analysis in glaucoma suspects].
    Chiseliţă D; Danielescu C; Apostol A
    Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 18714501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 18078852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. [Automatic perimetry in glaucoma. Value of Humphrey Field Analyzer standard tests].
    Brusini P
    Ophtalmologie; 1988; 2(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 3244469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. [Influence of dry eye syndrome on glaucoma diagnostic procedures].
    Rüfer F; Erb C
    Ophthalmologe; 2012 Nov; 109(11):1082-6. PubMed ID: 23179813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. FDT Perimetry for Glaucoma Detection in Comprehensive Health Checkup Service.
    Terauchi R; Wada T; Ogawa S; Kaji M; Kato T; Tatemichi M; Nakano T
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():4687398. PubMed ID: 32318280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. [The advantages and limits of computerized static perimetry].
    Kaucsár E
    Oftalmologia; 1997; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9138491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.