These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17952601)

  • 21. A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
    J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2884-92. PubMed ID: 23017379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models.
    Chen G; Schmutz B; Epari D; Rathnayaka K; Ibrahim S; Schuetz MA; Pearcy MJ
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19942221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient-specific fracture risk assessment of vertebrae: A multiscale approach coupling X-ray physics and continuum micromechanics.
    Blanchard R; Morin C; Malandrino A; Vella A; Sant Z; Hellmich C
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 26666734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2194-200. PubMed ID: 17073324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial orientation in bone samples and Young's modulus.
    Geraets WG; van Ruijven LJ; Verheij JG; van der Stelt PF; van Eijden TM
    J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2206-10. PubMed ID: 18539283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Structural and mechanical properties of mandibular condylar bone.
    van Eijden TM; van der Helm PN; van Ruijven LJ; Mulder L
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 16373677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modified bone density-dependent orthotropic material model of human mandibular bone.
    Gačnik F; Ren Z; Hren NI
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1684-92. PubMed ID: 25456399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A patient-specific computer tomography-based finite element methodology to calculate the six dimensional stiffness matrix of human vertebral bodies.
    Chevalier Y; Zysset PK
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051006. PubMed ID: 22757494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Dec; 7(6):463-76. PubMed ID: 17972122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments.
    Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jun; 133(6):061001. PubMed ID: 21744921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
    Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elasticity-density and viscoelasticity-density relationships at the tibia mid-diaphysis assessed from resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurements.
    Bernard S; Schneider J; Varga P; Laugier P; Raum K; Grimal Q
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Feb; 15(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 26070349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
    Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical finite element model for bone shape and biomechanical properties.
    Belenguer Querol L; Büchler P; Rueckert D; Nolte LP; González Ballester MA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):405-11. PubMed ID: 17354916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
    Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The prospects of estimating trabecular bone tissue properties from the combination of ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and microfinite element analysis.
    van Lenthe GH; van den Bergh JP; Hermus AR; Huiskes R
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Mar; 16(3):550-5. PubMed ID: 11277273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in the fabric and compliance tensors of cancellous bone due to trabecular surface remodeling, predicted by a digital image-based model.
    Tsubota K; Adachi T
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Aug; 7(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 15512762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anisotropic finite element modeling for patient-specific mandible.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Dec; 88(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 17983684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vivo assessment of architecture and micro-finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius.
    Newitt DC; Majumdar S; van Rietbergen B; von Ingersleben G; Harris ST; Genant HK; Chesnut C; Garnero P; MacDonald B
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jan; 13(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 11878456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.