These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty--A study of 203 cases. Mandal A; Bahia H; Ahmad T; Stewart KJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(11):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17046626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Cartilage-Scoring and Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications and Aesthetic Outcome of 1060 Ears. Smittenberg MN; Marsman M; Veeger NJGM; Moues CM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4):500e-506e. PubMed ID: 29595722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two incisionless otoplasty techniques for prominent ears in children. Haytoglu S; Haytoglu TG; Bayar Muluk N; Kuran G; Arikan OK Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 25650142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Otoplasty technique: how I do it. Burningham AR; Stucker FJ Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2006 May; 14(2):73-7, v. PubMed ID: 16750765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Otoplasty with an unusual cartilage scoring approach. Gümüş N; Yılmaz S J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2016; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 26176319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Cartilage Scoring in Correction of Prominent Ear with Incisionless Otoplasty Technique in Pediatric Patients. Haytoğlu S; Haytoğlu TG; Kuran G; Yıldırım İ; Arıkan OK J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 27810844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamometric Analysis of Normative Auricular Stiffness and Comparison With Operated Prominent Ears. Ozturan O; Dogan R; Ozucer B; Yildirim YS; Meric A J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2155-9. PubMed ID: 26468801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Minimally invasive otoplasty]. Benedict M; Pirwitz KU HNO; 2005 Mar; 53(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 15719248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cartilage-sparing versus the cartilage-cutting technique: a retrospective quality control comparison of the Francesconi and Converse otoplasties. Kompatscher P; Schuler CH; Clemens S; Seifert B; Beer GM Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):446-53. PubMed ID: 14994169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finesse in otoplasty in four steps. Ribeiro JA; da Silva GS Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):846-52. PubMed ID: 22678134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective analysis of the Farrior technique for otoplasty. Scharer SA; Farrior EH; Farrior RT Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2007; 9(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 17519206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 'WiFi' otoplasty : Combined concentric posterior microchondrectomies and sutures for correction of prominent ears. Hendrickx BIMM; Hamdi M; Zeltzer A; Greensmith A J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jun; 71(6):900-905. PubMed ID: 29472155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical devices in otoplasty to obtain a natural appearance. Zaoli G Facial Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 13(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 9558528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Otoplasty technique. Adamson PA; Litner JA Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2006 May; 14(2):79-87, v. PubMed ID: 16750766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]