540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17953314)
1. 2008 accreditation decision rules for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Aug; 27(8):3-9. PubMed ID: 17953314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 2004 aggregation and decision rules approved for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Aug; 23(8):1, 3-6. PubMed ID: 12920779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How to stay prepared for a random unannounced survey.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11147546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. REVISED: Accreditation with Follow-up Survey and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation Decision Processes for Organizations Undergoing Resurvey.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2015 Mar; 35(3):1, 3, 5. PubMed ID: 26427283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should you consider ISO 9000?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10175807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Corrections to "Joint Commission Accreditation Process" chapter in 2006 Comprehensive Manuals.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Nov; 25(11):5. PubMed ID: 16700334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 2009 accreditation decision rules.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Aug; 28(8):13-9. PubMed ID: 18798365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle.
Ente BH
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Revisions to 2012 decision rules for Contingent Accreditation. Changes cover fraud and abuse and organizations new to accreditation.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2012 Jan; 32(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 22360129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The launch of Shared Visions-New Pathways.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14746090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New accreditation product approved for systems under the ambulatory and home care programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):8. PubMed ID: 15969299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interim weighted decision rules not applied under certain circumstances.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Mar; 24(3):8. PubMed ID: 15035233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. GAO report affirms integrity of Joint Commission accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Feb; 27(2):3. PubMed ID: 17370750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Revisions to the Public Information Policy.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):7, 9. PubMed ID: 16515349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Approved: remaining component to the accreditation decision methodology for 2009.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):3-4. PubMed ID: 19186441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. QI professionals take harder look at alternatives to JCAHO accreditation.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2003 Sep; 10(9):97-100. PubMed ID: 12966682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. APPROVED: an extension for extension surveys.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):8. PubMed ID: 19845208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Going global. JCAHO to accredit foreign healthcare organizations.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1998 Apr; 28(14):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10178298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
