180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17954666)
1. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro.
Blum MB; Schmook M; Schernthaner R; Edelhauser G; Puchner S; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 17954666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptibility and quantification of in-stent stenosis with six peripheral arterial stent types in vitro: comparison of 16-MDCT angiography, 64-MDCT angiography, and MR angiography.
Schernthaner MB; Edelhauser G; Berzaczy D; Schernthaner R; Wolf F; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1346-51. PubMed ID: 20410424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.
Maintz D; Tombach B; Juergens KU; Weigel S; Heindel W; Fischbach R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1319-22. PubMed ID: 12388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of stent patency and in-stent stenoses in 10 metallic stents using MR angiography.
Hamer OW; Borisch I; Paetzel C; Nitz WR; Seitz J; Feuerbach S; Zorger N
Br J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 79(944):636-43. PubMed ID: 16641417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.
Lettau M; Kotter E; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 41(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 24411522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography.
Nolz R; Wibmer A; Beitzke D; Gentzsch S; Willfort-Ehringer A; Lammer J; Thurnher M; Schoder M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 21211920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI may be sufficient for noninvasive assessment of great vessel stents: an in vitro comparison of MRI, CT, and conventional angiography.
Nordmeyer J; Gaudin R; Tann OR; Lurz PC; Bonhoeffer P; Taylor AM; Muthurangu V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):865-71. PubMed ID: 20858811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo evaluation of patency and in-stent stenoses after implantation of nitinol stents in iliac arteries using MR angiography.
Hamer OW; Finkenzeller T; Borisch I; Paetzel C; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Nitz W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 16247150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers.
Létourneau-Guillon L; Soulez G; Beaudoin G; Oliva VL; Giroux MF; Qin Z; Boussion N; Therasse E; De Guise J; Cloutier G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15178723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis.
Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 18210314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.
Gitsioudis G; Fortner P; Stuber M; Missiou A; Andre F; Müller OJ; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 27535040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Flohr T; Krämer S; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Invest Radiol; 2003 Dec; 38(12):790-5. PubMed ID: 14627897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.
Lenhart M; Völk M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Strotzer M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 11012441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.
Wall A; Kugel H; Bachman R; Matuszewski L; Krämer S; Heindel W; Maintz D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 16270296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of high-resolution MRI using gadofosveset for stent-graft planning: comparison with CT angiography in 30 patients.
Wolf F; Plank C; Beitzke D; Popovic M; Domenig CM; Weber M; Loewe C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1251-7. PubMed ID: 22021522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stent-assisted intracranial angioplasty: potentials and limitations of pre- and postinterventional CT angiography].
Schlötzer W; Huber R; Schmitz BL
Rofo; 2009 Feb; 181(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19173154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.
Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 96(12):883-90. PubMed ID: 17694381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 4D phase contrast flow imaging for in-stent flow visualization and assessment of stent patency in peripheral vascular stents--a phantom study.
Bunck AC; Jüttner A; Kröger JR; Burg MC; Kugel H; Niederstadt T; Tiemann K; Schnackenburg B; Crelier GR; Heindel W; Maintz D
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):e929-37. PubMed ID: 22770579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
