BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17954924)

  • 1. Mating systems and the efficacy of selection at the molecular level.
    Glémin S
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):905-16. PubMed ID: 17954924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An integrative test of the dead-end hypothesis of selfing evolution in Triticeae (Poaceae).
    Escobar JS; Cenci A; Bolognini J; Haudry A; Laurent S; David J; Glémin S
    Evolution; 2010 Oct; 64(10):2855-72. PubMed ID: 20500214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of selfing is accompanied by reduced efficacy of selection and purging of deleterious mutations.
    Arunkumar R; Ness RW; Wright SI; Barrett SC
    Genetics; 2015 Mar; 199(3):817-29. PubMed ID: 25552275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutation accumulation in a selfing population: consequences of different mutation rates between selfers and outcrossers.
    Nakayama S; Shi S; Tateno M; Shimada M; Takahasi KR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33541. PubMed ID: 22448251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mating system and recombination affect molecular evolution in four Triticeae species.
    Haudry A; Cenci A; Guilhaumon C; Paux E; Poirier S; Santoni S; David J; Glémin S
    Genet Res (Camb); 2008 Feb; 90(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 18289404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants.
    Glémin S; Bazin E; Charlesworth D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Dec; 273(1604):3011-9. PubMed ID: 17015349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mating systems and selection efficacy: a test using chloroplastic sequence data in Angiosperms.
    Glémin S; Muyle A
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Jul; 27(7):1386-99. PubMed ID: 24674012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hitchhiking of deleterious alleles and the cost of adaptation in partially selfing species.
    Hartfield M; Glémin S
    Genetics; 2014 Jan; 196(1):281-93. PubMed ID: 24240529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion: I. Mutation load and inbreeding depression.
    Glémin S
    Genetics; 2010 Jul; 185(3):939-59. PubMed ID: 20421602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of recombination in self-fertilizing organisms.
    Stetsenko R; Roze D
    Genetics; 2022 Aug; 222(1):. PubMed ID: 35929790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduced efficacy of natural selection on codon usage bias in selfing Arabidopsis and Capsella species.
    Qiu S; Zeng K; Slotte T; Wright S; Charlesworth D
    Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():868-80. PubMed ID: 21856647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The genetic basis of selfing rate evolution.
    Xu K
    Evolution; 2022 May; 76(5):883-898. PubMed ID: 35395695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epistasis, inbreeding depression, and the evolution of self-fertilization.
    Abu Awad D; Roze D
    Evolution; 2020 Jul; 74(7):1301-1320. PubMed ID: 32386235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating.
    Glémin S
    Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2678-87. PubMed ID: 14761049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of selfing on multi-step adaptation.
    Xu K
    Evolution; 2023 Feb; 77(2):482-495. PubMed ID: 36629514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limits to Adaptation in Partially Selfing Species.
    Hartfield M; Glémin S
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):959-74. PubMed ID: 27098913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An explicit model for the inbreeding load in the evolutionary analysis of selfing.
    García-Dorado A
    Evolution; 2017 May; 71(5):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 28323327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS.
    Husband BC; Schemske DW
    Evolution; 1996 Feb; 50(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 28568860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mating system impacts the genetic architecture of adaptation to heterogeneous environments.
    Hodgins KA; Yeaman S
    New Phytol; 2019 Nov; 224(3):1201-1214. PubMed ID: 31505030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular Evolution of Freshwater Snails with Contrasting Mating Systems.
    Burgarella C; Gayral P; Ballenghien M; Bernard A; David P; Jarne P; Correa A; Hurtrez-Boussès S; Escobar J; Galtier N; Glémin S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Sep; 32(9):2403-16. PubMed ID: 25980005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.