These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17955106)

  • 1. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Poppema ST
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Gartner EC
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
    Joyce T
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Pevsner WJ
    MedGenMed; 2007 Aug; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18092047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Nordholm S
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further evidence on the internal validity of the early legal access research design.
    Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):899-904. PubMed ID: 24665473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. If only policy analysis were so easy.
    Joyce T
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
    Hammell H
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy.
    Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--abortion rights--fourth circuit declares Virginia partial birth infanticide statute unconstitutional per se.--Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Hicks, 409 F.3d 619 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 422 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2005).
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 16489721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choosing balance: congressional powers and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Schecter A
    Fordham Law Rev; 2005 Mar; 73(4):1987-2206. PubMed ID: 15828129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AMWA position statement on abortion and reproductive rights.
    Devi G; Glodowski M; Shin E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 19281313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion care as a key women's health service.
    Regan L
    BJOG; 2017 Dec; 124(13):1922. PubMed ID: 29165922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.