186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17955238)
41. [
Adam JA; Poel E; van Eck Smit BLF; Mom CH; Stalpers LJA; Laan JJ; Kidd E; Stoker J; Bipat S
BMC Cancer; 2024 Apr; 24(1):513. PubMed ID: 38654241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor volume measured by ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT are sensitive biomarkers for the presence of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Vural GU; Akkas BE; Demirel BB
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 25018135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prognostic values of ADC
Akkus Yildirim B; Onal C; Erbay G; Cem Guler O; Karadeli E; Reyhan M; Koc Z
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):224-230. PubMed ID: 30354907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Histologic results of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical cancer with negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in the para-aortic area.
Boughanim M; Leboulleux S; Rey A; Pham CT; Zafrani Y; Duvillard P; Lumbroso J; Haie-Meder C; Schlumberger M; Morice P
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(15):2558-61. PubMed ID: 18487573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Positron emission tomography in evaluating the feasibility of curative intent in cervical cancer patients with limited distant lymph node metastases.
Chao A; Ho KC; Wang CC; Cheng HH; Lin G; Yen TC; Lai CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Aug; 110(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 18499238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Outcome of cervical carcinoma with locoregional lymph node involvement by FDG-PET].
Paumier A; Blanchard P; Mazeron R; Dumas I; Morice P; Lhomme C; Leboulleux S; Haie-Meder C
Cancer Radiother; 2012 May; 16(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 22387194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prognostic Significance of FDG Uptake of Bone Marrow on PET/CT in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Curative Surgical Resection.
Lee JW; Na JO; Kang DY; Lee SY; Lee SM
Clin Lung Cancer; 2017 Mar; 18(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 27495385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake value measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Cacicedo J; Fernandez I; Del Hoyo O; Navarro A; Gomez-Iturriaga A; Pijoan JI; Martinez-Indart L; Escudero J; Gomez-Suarez J; de Zarate RO; Perez JF; Bilbao P; Rades D
Clin Transl Oncol; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1337-1349. PubMed ID: 28540535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prediction model for para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Shim SH; Kim DY; Lee SJ; Kim SN; Kang SB; Lee SW; Park JY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 144(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 27855989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph node status in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Li W; Xiong L; Zhu Q; Lu H; Zhong M; Liang M; Jiang W; Wang Y; Cheng W
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):484. PubMed ID: 33933005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic PET Parameters in Cervical Cancer Patients With Metabolic Complete Response After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Son SH; Jeong SY; Chong GO; Lee YH; Park SH; Lee CH; Hong CM; Jeong JH; Lee SW; Ahn BC; Lee J
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 43(9):e296-e303. PubMed ID: 30036243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prognostic value of volume-based (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT parameters in patients with clinically node-negative oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Lee SJ; Choi JY; Lee HJ; Baek CH; Son YI; Hyun SH; Moon SH; Kim BT
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(6):752-9. PubMed ID: 23118574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Improved prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET using a simple visual analysis of tumor characteristics in patients with cervical cancer.
Miller TR; Pinkus E; Dehdashti F; Grigsby PW
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 12571208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A multiparametric PET-CT study.
Li K; Sun H; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():153-157. PubMed ID: 30927941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing survival outcomes between surgical and radiographic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Yang J; Delara R; Magrina J; Magtibay P; Yi J; Langstraat C; Robertson M; Dinh T; Butler K
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 156(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 31843274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical response of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenopathy to a radiation boost in the definitive management of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Rash DL; Lee YC; Kashefi A; Durbin-Johnson B; Mathai M; Valicenti R; Mayadev JS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 23906933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix.
Grigsby PW; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Sep; 19(17):3745-9. PubMed ID: 11533097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection of early recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer.
Ryu SY; Kim MH; Choi SC; Choi CW; Lee KH
J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 12620999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. FDG-PET-based prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kidd EA; El Naqa I; Siegel BA; Dehdashti F; Grigsby PW
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 22735785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
Leray H; Gabiache E; Courbon F; Brenot-Rossi I; Colineaux H; Lepage B; Lambaudie E; Martinez A; Voglimacci M; Weyl A; Deslandres M; Ducassou A; Motton S; Vaysse C; Chantalat E
J Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1442-1447. PubMed ID: 32034109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
