These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17955751)

  • 1. 50% off or buy one get one free? Frame preference as a function of consumable nature in dairy products.
    Li S; Sun Y; Wang Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 17955751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects?
    Rönnlund M; Karlsson E; Laggnäs E; Larsson L; Lindström T
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jan; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15685961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making.
    Almashat S; Ayotte B; Edelstein B; Margrett J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Apr; 71(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retailer branding of consumer sales promotions. A major development in food marketing?
    Hamlin RP; Lindsay S; Insch A
    Appetite; 2012 Feb; 58(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 22036836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using decoy effects to influence an online brand choice: the role of price-quality trade-offs.
    Hsu HC; Liu WL
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2011 Apr; 14(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 21039134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Humor in advertisements enhances product liking by mere association.
    Strick M; van Baaren RB; Holland RW; van Knippenberg A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 19309215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in choice satisfaction: a positivity effect in decision making.
    Kim S; Healey MK; Goldstein D; Hasher L; Wiprzycka UJ
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18361652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intentional forgetting as a facilitator for recalling new product attributes.
    Shapiro S; Lindsey C; Krishnan HS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 17154773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eager sellers and stony buyers: understanding the psychology of new-product adoption.
    Gourville JT
    Harv Bus Rev; 2006 Jun; 84(6):98-106, 145. PubMed ID: 16770897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of point-of-purchase tobacco advertising and promotions with choice of usual brand among teenage smokers.
    Wakefield MA; Ruel EE; Chaloupka FJ; Slater SJ; Kaufman NJ
    J Health Commun; 2002; 7(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 12049420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mere exposure and the endowment effect on consumer decision making.
    Tom G; Nelson C; Srzentic T; King R
    J Psychol; 2007 Mar; 141(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 17479582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-to-consumer advertising and its utility in health care decision making: a consumer perspective.
    Deshpande A; Menon A; Perri M; Zinkhan G
    J Health Commun; 2004; 9(6):499-513. PubMed ID: 15764449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care.
    Foster MM; Earl PE; Haines TP; Mitchell GK
    Health Policy; 2010 Oct; 97(2-3):105-12. PubMed ID: 20466449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The comparative mind-set: from animal comparisons to increased purchase intentions.
    Xu AJ; Wyer RS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Sep; 19(9):859-64. PubMed ID: 18947350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bounded ethicality: the perils of loss framing.
    Kern MC; Chugh D
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Mar; 20(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 19222811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information.
    Fischer P; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 18211174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional foods: health claim-food product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation.
    van Kleef E; van Trijp HC; Luning P
    Appetite; 2005 Jun; 44(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 15894404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How consumers respond to the behavior of missing a free gift promotion: inaction inertia effect on products offered as free gifts.
    Liu TC; Cheng T; Ni FY
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(3):361-81. PubMed ID: 21675187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct-to-consumer ads can influence behavior. Advertising increases consumer knowledge and prescription drug requests.
    Peyrot M; Alperstein NM; Van Doren D; Poli LG
    Mark Health Serv; 1998; 18(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 10180332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding customer reactions to brokered ultimatums: applying negotiation and justice theory.
    Humphrey SE; Ellis AP; Conlon DE; Tinsley CH
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):466-82. PubMed ID: 15161406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.