These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17955998)

  • 21. Prediction of allergenicity of gene-modified foods by serum-based testing.
    Poulsen LK
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 May; 964():185-96. PubMed ID: 12023205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of endogenous allergenicity of genetically modified plants exemplified by soybean - Where do we stand?
    Selb R; Wal JM; Moreno FJ; Lovik M; Mills C; Hoffmann-Sommergruber K; Fernandez A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 101():139-148. PubMed ID: 28111299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of a Milk Basic Protein fraction.
    Goodman RE; Taylor SL; Yamamura J; Kobayashi T; Kawakami H; Kruger CL; Thompson GP
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 45(10):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17482742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Safety assessment of biotechnology products for potential risk of food allergy: implications of new research.
    Selgrade MK; Bowman CC; Ladics GS; Privalle L; Laessig SA
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jul; 110(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19363142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 18033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetically modified soybeans and food allergies.
    Herman EM
    J Exp Bot; 2003 May; 54(386):1317-9. PubMed ID: 12709477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Review of the development of methodology for evaluating the human allergenic potential of novel proteins.
    Taylor SL
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2006 Jul; 50(7):604-9. PubMed ID: 16736463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comprehensive in silico allergenicity assessment of novel protein engineered chimeric Cry proteins for safe deployment in crops.
    Rathinam M; Singh S; Pattanayak D; Sreevathsa R
    BMC Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28768539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Protein allergenicity assessment of foods produced through agricultural biotechnology.
    Taylor SL
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 2002; 42():99-112. PubMed ID: 11807166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Food allergies, cross-reactions and agroalimentary biotechnologies.
    Ronchetti R; Kaczmarski MG; Hałuszka J; Jesenak M; Villa MP
    Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():98-103. PubMed ID: 18217398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology.
    Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and laboratory investigation of allergy to genetically modified foods.
    Bernstein JA; Bernstein IL; Bucchini L; Goldman LR; Hamilton RG; Lehrer S; Rubin C; Sampson HA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jun; 111(8):1114-21. PubMed ID: 12826483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proteomic approaches for qualitative and quantitative characterisation of food allergens.
    Sancho AI; Mills EN
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3 Suppl):S42-6. PubMed ID: 20828591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI.
    Glenn KC
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Industrial dimensions of food allergy.
    Crevel R
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2002 Nov; 30(Pt 6):941-4. PubMed ID: 12440951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Global Adoption of Genetically Modified (GM) Crops: Challenges for the Public Sector.
    Huesing JE; Andres D; Braverman MP; Burns A; Felsot AS; Harrigan GG; Hellmich RL; Reynolds A; Shelton AM; Jansen van Rijssen W; Morris EJ; Eloff JN
    J Agric Food Chem; 2016 Jan; 64(2):394-402. PubMed ID: 26751159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Approaches to assessment of the allergenic potential of novel proteins in food from genetically modified crops.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2002 Jul; 68(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 12075104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods.
    Poulsen LK
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2004 Nov; 48(6):413-23. PubMed ID: 15508176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.