These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17956368)

  • 1. Technical Note: grading the vertical cup:disc ratio and the effect of scaling.
    Bennett R; Spry PG; Fenerty CH; Harper RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 17956368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography.
    Hatch WV; Trope GE; Buys YM; Macken P; Etchells EE; Flanagan JG
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Apr; 8(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10209725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital stereoscopic analysis of the optic disc: evaluation of a teaching program.
    Sheen NJ; Morgan JE; Poulsen JL; North RV
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1873-9. PubMed ID: 15465549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observer variability in optic disc assessment: implications for glaucoma shared care.
    Harper R; Reeves B; Smith G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Jul; 20(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 10962691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.
    Spaeth GL; Henderer J; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Katz LJ; Myers J; Rhee D; Steinmann W
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():181-5; discussion 185-6. PubMed ID: 12545692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists in optic disc assessment: training implications for glaucoma co-management.
    Harper R; Radi N; Reeves BC; Fenerty C; Spencer AF; Batterbury M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 239(5):342-50. PubMed ID: 11482337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-observer agreement in clinical optic disc measurement using a modified 60 D lens.
    Haslett RS; Batterbury M; Cuypers M; Cooper RL
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 5)():692-7. PubMed ID: 9474320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agreement and accuracy of non-expert ophthalmologists in assessing glaucomatous changes in serial stereo optic disc photographs.
    Breusegem C; Fieuws S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Apr; 118(4):742-6. PubMed ID: 21055815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of pharmacological mydriasis on biomicroscopic evaluation of the glaucomatous optic nerve head.
    O'Brien PD; Bogdan AJ; Fitzpatrick P; Beatty S
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Nov; 19(11):1194-9. PubMed ID: 15543187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change.
    Altangerel U; Bayer A; Henderer JD; Katz LJ; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15629818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of optic disc photographs for glaucoma by UK optometrists: the Moorfields Optic Disc Assessment Study (MODAS).
    Hadwin SE; Redmond T; Garway-Heath DF; Lemij HG; Reus NJ; Ward G; Anderson RS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 23634792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes.
    Vessani RM; Moritz R; Batis L; Zagui RB; Bernardoni S; Susanna R
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Mar; 18(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 19295383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry.
    Kwon YH; Adix M; Zimmerman MB; Piette S; Greenlee EC; Alward WL; Abràmoff MD
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 19365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma.
    Abrams LS; Scott IU; Spaeth GL; Quigley HA; Varma R
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1662-7. PubMed ID: 7936564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc.
    Lichter PR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1976; 74():532-72. PubMed ID: 867638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated cup/disc ratio: a tool for ophthalmologists.
    Barbosa CP; Angelini PF; Schor P; Paranhos Junior A
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2010; 73(4):320-2. PubMed ID: 20944932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale.
    Henderer JD; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 12504696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of size on paired 'C/D' estimations.
    Shipp MD; Houston G; Shook YT
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Jan; 61(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 2319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement among optometrists and ophthalmologists in estimating limbal anterior chamber depth using the van Herick method.
    Jindal A; Myint J; Edgar DF; Nolan WP; Lawrenson JG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 25684241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS): interobserver agreement of a new grading system to assess glaucomatous optic disc damage.
    Bochmann F; Howell JP; Meier C; Becht C; Thiel MA
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 19384783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.