670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17956539)
1. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Controversy over genetically modified organisms: the governing laws and regulations.
Keatley KL
Qual Assur; 2000; 8(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11710306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The history and contemporary challenges of the US Food and Drug Administration.
Borchers AT; Hagie F; Keen CL; Gershwin ME
Clin Ther; 2007 Jan; 29(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17379043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Will we reap what biopharming sows?
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):480-1. PubMed ID: 12721561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Playing catch-up.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):637. PubMed ID: 15175666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Agbiotech issues climb US political agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1179-80. PubMed ID: 12454658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Roger Beachy. Interview by Emily Waltz.
Beachy R
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 28(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 20062028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Agricultural biotechnology: occupational health and regulatory issues.
Glass DJ
Occup Med; 1991; 6(2):301-10. PubMed ID: 2047979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
