670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17956539)
21. The environmental impact subterfuge.
Conko G; Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 21139607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
Miller HI
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nutrition and food commodities in the 20th century.
Martini SA; Phillips M
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Sep; 57(18):8130-5. PubMed ID: 19719130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. US launches probe into sales of unapproved transgenic corn.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):423. PubMed ID: 15791213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. No "killer tomatoes": easing federal regulation of genetically engineered plants.
Beach JE
Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11795332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Puzzling industry response to ProdiGene fiasco.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12511893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Food security: rigorous regulation required.
Mellon M
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5975):171-2. PubMed ID: 20378799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics.
Bradford KJ; Van Deynze A; Gutterson N; Parrott W; Strauss SH
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 15815671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. USDA appeases organic lobby.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):217. PubMed ID: 10096276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Biotechnology. Japanese controversies over transgenic crop regulation.
Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1572. PubMed ID: 15361611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The real curse of Frankenfood.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):113. PubMed ID: 10052332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The regulation of agricultural biotechnology: science shows a better way.
Miller HI
N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 20603236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.
McHughen A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):725-7. PubMed ID: 17621292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Gene technology regulation in Australia: a decade of a federal implementation of a statutory legal code in a context of constituent states taking divergent positions.
Tribe D
GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22614636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
